Comment # 15 on bug 3805 from Antonio Trande

(In reply to Andrea Musuruane from comment #14)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13)
> > - Include "BSD and Boost" licenses.
> 
> Please remember the license tag is not a list of licenses found in the
> source archive but it refers to the licenses of the contents of the *binary
> RPM*:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License:_field
> 
> Moreover there is no BSD license in cannonball: "find . -name \* -type f
> -exec grep "in source and binary forms" {} \;" does not return anything!

BSD (unspecified)
-----------------
cannonball-0.3/docs/license.txt
??

$ licensecheck -r * |grep BSL
src/main/cannonboard/asyncserial.cpp: *No copyright* BSL (v1.0)
src/main/cannonboard/asyncserial.hpp: *No copyright* BSL (v1.0)

'asyncserial.cpp' is directly involved during build, this is a Mixed Source
Licensing Scenario:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario

> 
> Therefore the resulting license of the binary RPM is the MAME license (i.e.
> MAME + BOOST = MAME).

Where is this  reported this uniformity?
However, there is no any reference to the 'MAME' license in the source archive;
or am i wrong?