On Ter, 2013-11-19 at 22:13 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2013/11/19 Sérgio Basto <sergio@serjux.com>
>         On Sáb, 2013-11-09 at 09:07 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>         > On Qui, 2013-11-07 at 16:58 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>         > > On Sáb, 2013-11-02 at 20:01 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>         > > > W dniu 02.11.2013 02:52, Sérgio Basto pisze:
>         > > > > On Qui, 2013-10-31 at 07:45 +0100, Julian Sikorski
>         wrote:
>         > > > >> we should definitely do x264 first to save time.
>         > > > >
>         > > > > OK!, x264 built with bootstrap , we can follow, this
>         wiki page
>         > > > > http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists first
>         paragraph
>         > > > > Mass rebuild when bumping SO version of x264 and
>         ffmpeg .
>         > > > >
>         > > > > Thanks and best regards,
>         > > > >
>         > > > ffmpeg build submitted. I will update mplayer later.
>         > >
>         > > Hi, seems to me , ffmpeg doesn't bump so !
>         > >
>         > > may I submit mjpegtools ? to update 2.0.0 to 2.1.0
>         >
>         > OK please rebuild for F20
>         > gstreamer-plugins-bad
>         > gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld
>         > transcode
>         > y4mscaler
>         >
>         >
>         > The repoquery for what requires mjpegtools :
>         > repoquery --whatrequires `repoquery --provides mjpegtools\*
>         | grep so |
>         > perl -pe 's/(.*?)-.*/\1*/'` --alldeps --source | sort -u |
>         perl -pe
>         > 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' | grep -v
>         mjpegtools
>         >
>         > I will update wiki
>         http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists
>
>
>         Hi, just check mjpegtools-2.1.0 integrate y4mscaler , I just
>         diff the
>         code between mjpegtools-2.1.0 and y4mscaler and they are equal
>         so I
>         think the best solution for bug
>         https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3022
>         is Obsoletes: y4mscaler
>         anyone against it ?
> Nope,
>
>
> Can you make the changes from the mjpegtools side ?

Done , thks