Bug ID | 4535 |
---|---|
Summary | Review request: kodi-visualization-spectrum - Spectrum visualizer for Kodi |
Product | Package Reviews |
Version | Current |
Hardware | x86_64 |
OS | GNU/Linux |
Status | NEW |
Severity | enhancement |
Priority | P1 |
Component | Review Request |
Assignee | rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org |
Reporter | development-K9RvgheM1OmXW9pm@dcrdev.com |
CC | rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org |
Hello, I'd like to submit a package for the inputstream.adaptive Kodi plugin, to be reviewed. The spec, debuginfo and source rpm can be found here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dcrdev/rpm-kodi-visualization-spectrum/kodi-visualization-spectrum-17.1-0.1.20161206git73c8786/kodi-visualization-spectrum.spec https://github.com/dcrdev/rpm-kodi-visualization-spectrum/releases/download/kodi-visualization-spectrum-17.1-0.1.20161206git73c8786/kodi-inputstream-adaptive-debuginfo-17.1-0.1.20161215gitcd26d5d.fc25.x86_64.rpm https://github.com/dcrdev/rpm-kodi-visualization-spectrum/releases/download/kodi-visualization-spectrum-17.1-0.1.20161206git73c8786/kodi-inputstream-adaptive-17.1-0.1.20161215gitcd26d5d.fc25.src.rpm A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec file): An OpenGL Spectrum visualizer for Kodi - this is the default visualization for Kodi on other platforms i.e. Ubuntu, Windows etc... Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. This is an extension of Kodi and therefore for the same reasons as Kodi this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for each message why you've chosen to ignore it. 1 Error in opengl_spectrum.cpp - this is relation to the wrong address being used on the license upstream. I will file a bug upstream. Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package. I have another package awaiting review, I have never previously had a package approved. Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I am not a sponsored packager, so yes I am seeking a sponsor. Thanks