Re: @packagers: please check that your packages are properly listed in the comps files
>> - check the list of packages you own by looking at
>> free/owners.list and nonfree/owners.list
>
> well, ufoai and ufoai-data are in free while these were
> moved to nonfree...
One of those mistakes I might have corrected if I had looked
closer at it yesterday. Sorry.
> so I should cut&paste these lines? -
Yes please.
bad luck:
**** Access denied: kvolny is not in ACL for owners
> or "Changes to this file must be done by a CVS
admin."?
/me is not sure if he can follow
this is within the owners file header ... if it is not true, then
it should be removed
Well, my initial mail (the one you replied to) wouldn't make
much sense if only CVS admins could edit those comps files,
wouldn't it? ;-)
if I understand it "make sure that everything is correct" then
the process of "making sure" could be either DIY or "bug someone
to do it" :-)
Not sure about ufoai-data and ufoai-doc. I'd say those
normally should simply get tracked in automatically when
installing ufoai (that's iirc how it working today). Thus the
user should not be bugged with it, thus they should not be in
the rpmfusion_nonfree-games group IMHO.
well, the catch is that ufoai-doc is not a dependency
> umm ... I see ufoai packages are not built yet
Huhu? They are there:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/testing/
8/x86_64/ufoai-2.2.1-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/testing/
9/x86_64/ufoai-2.2.1-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/development/x86_
64/os/ufoai-2.2.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
damn, I must have looked into wrong place, sorry
K.
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 197 bytes)