https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4215
--- Comment #4 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-08-28 22:54:17 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
> > - BSD File
> > # mlt/src/win32/fnmatch.{c,h} are BSD-licensed.
> >
> > Does fnmatch end up in the linux version since it's in the win32 folder? If
not
> > then you don't need to consider it for licensing purposes.
> >
>
> This are the licenses of source code , should I change here ? or in Fedora
> proper ? , but see that we don't remove win32 , from source , don't know
what
> should do.
The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the binary rpm:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines
"GPLv3 and LGPLv2+ and BSD" would mean that the in the resulting *binary* RPM
there some files under GLPv3, other files under LGPLv2+ and again others under
BSD. I guess this is not the case.
OK, fixed License: GPLv3 and LGPLv2+ , I removed the src/win32 after %setup ,
to be sure that is not used .
# mlt/src/win32/fnmatch.{c,h} are BSD-licensed.
# be sure that aren't used
rm -r src/win32/
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.