[Bug 750] Review request: opencore-amr - OpenCORE Adaptive Multi Rate Narrowband and Wideband speech lib
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750
Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-07 11:41:24 ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (ASL 2.0)
OK - License field in spec matches
see below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
see below - Sources match upstream md5sum:
NA - Package needs ExcludeArch
OK - BuildRequires correct
NA - Spec handles locales/find_lang
NA - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
OK, RPM Fusion - Package is code or permissible content.
NA - Doc subpackage needed/used.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
NA - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
OK - .so files in -devel subpackage.
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
OK - .la files are removed.
NA - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. (F11/x84_64)
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
opencore-amr-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
OK - final provides and requires are sane:
opencore-amr-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm
=
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
opencore-amr-0.1.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
libopencore-amrnb.so.0()(64bit)
libopencore-amrwb.so.0()(64bit)
opencore-amr = 0.1.1-1.fc10
opencore-amr(x86-64) = 0.1.1-1.fc10
=
/sbin/ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libopencore-amrnb.so.0()(64bit)
libopencore-amrwb.so.0()(64bit)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
opencore-amr-debuginfo-0.1.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
opencore-amr-debuginfo = 0.1.1-1.fc10
opencore-amr-debuginfo(x86-64) = 0.1.1-1.fc10
=
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
opencore-amr-devel-0.1.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
opencore-amr-devel = 0.1.1-1.fc10
opencore-amr-devel(x86-64) = 0.1.1-1.fc10
=
libopencore-amrnb.so.0()(64bit)
libopencore-amrwb.so.0()(64bit)
opencore-amr = 0.1.1-1.fc10
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock. (fedora-11-x86_64)
see below - Should function as described.
OK - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
OK - Should have dist tag
see below - Should package latest version
Issues:
1. The source package does not include the text of the license, you should
contact upstream and encourage them to correct this mistake.
2. I couldn't check if sources matches upstream because they are no longer
available. I couldn't even tell if you packaged the latest version. I have to
trust you.
3. How can I test this library? Is there any program that can already use it?
These issues are not mandatory.
APPROVED!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.