On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 08:16 -0700, Richi Plana wrote:
Could totem-xine provide totem so that apps needing totem can be
satisfied with having totem-xine? Or should those apps require something
different? Say /usr/bin/totem?
This is actually addressed more to the Livna maintainers where I'm
getting my packages from, but if RPMFusion has decided to adopt
another's package, that's good as well.
If all goes well we won't have a need for totem-xine as there's
work being done upstream to make the engine selectable at runtime,
but until then I think we shouldn't do this. We don't want
totem-xine to replace base any Fedora packages (which is what it comes
down to if it is being pulled over the Fedora package to satisfy