https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3658
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com
Blocks|2 |4
--- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2015-06-01 12:36:01 CEST
---
Hi,
Full review done:
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:28: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame}
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:28: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion}
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:28: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src: W: invalid-url Source1:
rpmfusion-nonfree-22-icons.tar.gz
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
These can all be ignored.
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (CC0) OK
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream -> NA
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- macro use consistent
- content only, content which enriches existing foss apps, so ok
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
Everything looks good: Reviewed.
Thanks for your work on this, it will be good to have appdata available for
rpmfusion.
Regards,
Hans
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.