[Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396
--- Comment #46 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-23 09:52:40 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
I tried to find a more detailed explanation of both repo free|nonfree
but could
not find it in the wiki. It would be nice to have a page explaining what goes
in free and what does not.
I just edited the Configuration and the Contributors pages to give more
emphasis to the following text (taken from
http://rpmfusion.org/AnnounceRepository):
"We have two separate software repositories:
* "free" for Open Source Software (as defined by the Fedora Licensing
Guidelines) which the Fedora project cannot ship due to other reasons
* "nonfree" for redistributable software that is not Open Source Software
(as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines); this includes software with
publicly available source-code that has "no commercial use"-like
restrictions"
Because paintdotnet is not wholly licensed under an Open Source License (as
defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines) it must go to nonfree.
HTH,
Andrea.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.