FYI, an official 275.09.07 is released.
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> So what I plan to do instead is to import the driver in rawhide and
>> request users affected by this bug to use akmod-nvidia from rawhide.
>> The other plan is to maintain another branch of the driver as
>> nvidia-latest or nvidia-beta (which branch already exists). to provide
>> another parallele driver.
> Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation until today.
> I have built some -beta packages successfully but have some
> 1. I added a "Conflict:" for the non-beta package in the beta package.
> I assume we'd need to do the opposite for the non-beta package?
> 2. There are a few places where the spec file differ significantly
> from the template. Specifically in the "buildforkernels" macros. I
> as able to follow the wiki and get a new akmod package built but
> there's a small typo on the wiki as well. In the macro definition it
> should be "akmod" not "akmods" as that isn't a valid kmodtool
> 3. On a related note, the --newest, --current, & --akmod options are
> not shown in "kmodtool --help". Is this intentional?
>  http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2