On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Nicolas Chauvet
<kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> But using that list is unappropriate, you need to block #33 for that
> kind of request.
For the future, where should the co-maintainer request go? On the
initial package review bug?
I was searching around for a formal SOP for co-maintaining in RPM
Fusion, and I didn't see anything. I can add this to the wiki if you
want.
Whoops... my google-fu was not strong enough to find the instructions
at
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors/CVSRequests , so I added a small
section to
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors with a link to that page.