[Bug 2483] Review request: msttcore-fonts - TrueType core fonts for the web

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora(a)gmail.com --- Comment #52 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-06-11 07:07:18 CEST --- (In reply to comment #19) Hey, sorry for the late reply. Yes, I looked at the links and the posts. The only arguments that I found are: 1 - Existing MS font installation scripts or instructions are broken 2 - Some PDFs without embedded Windows fonts look bad, or they *may* give errors when a font is not found. Well, 1 - This is not an answer to my question, really. Q: Why do we want ice-cream? A: Because all ice-cream trucks are broken. Who cares? 2 - In my 12 years of Unix experience, I did not encounter such a PDF file. Assuming such a file exist (I am very curious to see this PDF file. It makes me wonder how Windows fonts can make a document look better. <rant>I guess I am tortured enough at work every day by those Windows fonts</rant>) can one not ask the PDF creator/distributor to provide a proper PDF file? Having the infinitesimal probability of accidentally installing Windows fonts on my Linux box irritates me enough. But we are in somewhat of a democracy. If you can find a package reviewer, and prove your way around the licensing and the packaging guidelines, you might ave a shot. Best -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.