Le 18 nov. 2013 21:52, "Sérgio Basto" <sergio@serjux.com> a écrit :
>
> On Seg, 2013-11-18 at 21:36 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > On 2013-11-18 20:29, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sex, 2013-11-15 at 19:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >> I wrote:
> > >>> And if FPC doesn't feel competent, they should say so so we can re-file
> > >>> the ticket with FESCo (or they could just forward it to FESCo directly).
> > >> Actually, I see FPC made a decision now, that's good.
> > > And what was decision ? , I don't understand what is write in the
> > > ticket .
> > >
> > It basically boils down to that the main lpf package is OK for fedora,
> > while lpf-* packages as lpf-skype and lpf-spotify-client should be in a
> > 'more appropriate repository' (Don't mention the war...)
> >
> > I have retired lpf-spotify-client from fedora. lpf-skype and
> > lpf-spotify-client are on their way into rpmfusion in tickets 3033 and
> > 3034 in a joint venture between me and Simone Caronni.
>
> I will join in with "Adobe flash reader", it is possible ?

Is it possible to only handle the adobe-release* repositories instead ? Unless all thoses adobe packages are really broken ?

Nicolas (kwizart)