Re: OpenAFS and Static Libraries

it looks like the proper thing to do is include these static libraries in the -devel sub-package and have that sub-package provide openafs-static. Secondly, many more experienced AFS administrators prefer the old Transarc style paths over the FHS paths that my packages use. I would like to create an openafs-transarc sub-package that includes the symlinks that would enable these non-standard paths. (Specifically, /usr/afs and /usr/vice.) The first issue with the static libs really needs to happen. The second issue is just pure annoyance but will make these packages more usable to certain folks. I'd like to do both. Are there any comments or reason why I should not? Jack Neely