On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:53 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 16.01.2012 14:48, Sérgio Basto pisze:
> Hi, so if I do :
>
> yum list \*mame\*
>
> Installed Packages
> gmameui.x86_64 0.2.10-1.fc12 @rpmfusion-nonfree
> mame.x86_64 0.144u5-1.fc16 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing
> mame-tools.x86_64 0.144u5-1.fc16 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing
> qmc2-sdlmame.x86_64 0.34-1.fc16 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
> sdlmame-data.noarch 0144-1.fc16 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing
> sdlmame-data-artwork.noarch 0120-3.fc11 @rpmfusion-nonfree
> sdlmame-data-roms.noarch 0120-3.fc11 @rpmfusion-nonfree
> Available Packages
> sdlmame.x86_64 0136-1.fc13 rpmfusion-nonfree
> sdlmame-data-samples.noarch 0139-1.fc14 rpmfusion-nonfree
> sdlmame-tools.x86_64 0136-1.fc13 rpmfusion-nonfree
>
> First question : what mame-data should be installed ? 120 or 136/9 or
> all or none ?
> Second sdlmame.x86_64 shouldn't be deleted ? since has been deprecated,
> IIRC, and others sdl-mame-data that are obsoleted ? .
>
> Thanks,
sdlmame is obsoleted by mame:
Provides: sdlmame = 0%{baseversion}-%{release}
Obsoletes: sdlmame < 0136-2
So I am not sure how you have managed to install both.
not installed !, is in "Available Packages" list
Available Packages
sdlmame.x86_64 0136-1.fc13 rpmfusion-nonfree
sdlmame-data-samples.noarch 0139-1.fc14 rpmfusion-nonfree
sdlmame-tools.x86_64 0136-1.fc13 rpmfusion-nonfree
The sdlmame-data packages are pretty unrelated to each other, they
distribute content. I was considering retiring those but given that the
maintenance overhead is pretty low, they are still in the repos.
so have install this 4 aren't a problem ;-)
sdlmame-data.noarch
sdlmame-data-artwork.noarch
sdlmame-data-roms.noarch
sdlmame-data-samples.noarch
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.