http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123
Stewart Adam <s.adam(a)diffingo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Stewart Adam <s.adam(a)diffingo.com> 2008-11-06 15:25:00 ---
- source files match upstream
--> We create our own tarballs, OK
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license text included in package.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds properly.
+ package installs properly.
+ debuginfo package looks complete.
- rpmlint is silent.
--> Warnings are OK to ignore
+ final provides and requires are sane:
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.