Hi, I'm getting the same error. I don't have a .ssh/config
file, and
do not know how to make one, but Ive made a new public key and
uploaded it and no matter what I try I keep getting a permission
denied error
$ echo $CVSROOT
:ext:xulchris@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/free
$ echo $CVS_RSH
ssh
$ cvs co common
Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any)
It wont even ask me for a password.
PLEASE HELP!
Has this been fixed in between (looks like it from the server logs)? If
not please send output of
ssh -v
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Xavier Lamien
<laxathom(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Michel Salim <michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> wrote:
>>> I've been fighting trying to get access to
cvs.rpmfusion.org the past 2
>>> days, without luck. Maybe I'm doing something fundamentally wrong.
>>>
>>> I import my public keys into fas, then follow instructions on
>>>
>>>
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-014c352d2815a61a3a0583acc3819fc50b...
>>>
>>> and alter my ~/.ssh/config to use the proper private key. I tried both
>>> using the same key I use for fedora, as well as generate a separate
>>> rpmfusion-only key. Neither seems to work. I only get:
>>>
>>> $ echo $CVSROOT
>>> :ext:rdieter@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs
>>>
>>> $ echo $CVS_RSH
>>> ssh
>>>
>>> $ cvs co free
>>> Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
>>> cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages
>>> if
>>> any)
>>>
>>> ??
>> Same here. Thorsten is on vacation, so we might have to wait for a while.
> Check your ~/.ssh config
>
>> One possibility: is CVS access restricted to people who are members of
>> cvsextras? I just applied, and I suppose the process will be more or
>> less perfunctory for existing Fedora packagers.
> I supposed you had a look to
http://rpmfusion.org
> If you just applied for the packager group you need first to be sponsored to
> have cvs access.
>
>
>> A curious thing is that the CLA for RPMfusion is exactly the one for
>> the Fedora project. I suppose this is intentional, but I'm not sure
>> whether this gives the impression that we are an official Fedora
>> project or not.
> Yeah, this cla version should be move away
>
>
> --
> Xavier.t Lamien
> --
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
> GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
> Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
>