9:41 p.m.
Hi,
if you go to http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/ you will see
that dosemu and pdflib-lite have been in waiting state since forever.
Just a heads up in an unlikely case I am the only one who noticed.
Cheers,
Julia
9:51 p.m.
2011/1/25 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com>:
Hi,
if you go to http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/ you will see
that dosemu and pdflib-lite have been in waiting state since forever.
Just a heads up in an unlikely case I am the only one who noticed.
This time there
is a bugreport already:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1163
Please use it.
Nicolas (kwizart)
8:33 p.m.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:51:47 +0100, Nicolas wrote:
2011/1/25 Julian Sikorski:
> Hi,
>
> if you go to http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/ you will see
> that dosemu and pdflib-lite have been in waiting state since forever.
> Just a heads up in an unlikely case I am the only one who noticed.
This time there is a bugreport already:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1163
Please use it.
Nicolas (kwizart)
Use it for what? It's a ticket opened on 2010-04-16 and referring back to
"December last year", which means 2009. It doesn't tell anything about
what is wrong. No status update. Nothing. Is there a problem with Plague?
Or just with the build target configuration on the builders?
3:23 a.m.
8583 (dosemu): Build on target el-5-rpmfusion_free was killed by
laxathom(a)fedoraproject.org.
Hey, whats with this? I didn't want my job killed, there was no
reason for that! All we need is a builder for EL-5/6 I thought it
would come eventually and the packages would be built? I see there is
still no repo for EL-6 either, why is there so little interest in
building packages for RHEL??
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:51:47 +0100, Nicolas wrote:
> 2011/1/25 Julian Sikorski:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if you go to http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/ you will see
> > that dosemu and pdflib-lite have been in waiting state since forever.
> > Just a heads up in an unlikely case I am the only one who noticed.
> This time there is a bugreport already:
>
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1163
>
> Please use it.
>
> Nicolas (kwizart)
Use it for what? It's a ticket opened on 2010-04-16 and referring back to
"December last year", which means 2009. It doesn't tell anything about
what is wrong. No status update. Nothing. Is there a problem with Plague?
Or just with the build target configuration on the builders?
11:46 a.m.
2011/1/29 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com>:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:51:47 +0100, Nicolas wrote:
> 2011/1/25 Julian Sikorski:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if you go to http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/ you will see
> > that dosemu and pdflib-lite have been in waiting state since forever.
> > Just a heads up in an unlikely case I am the only one who noticed.
> This time there is a bugreport already:
>
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1163
>
> Please use it.
>
> Nicolas (kwizart)
Use it for what? It's a ticket opened on 2010-04-16 and referring back to
"December last year", which means 2009. It doesn't tell anything about
what is wrong. No status update. Nothing. Is there a problem with Plague?
Or just with the build target configuration on the builders?
I don't understand the meaning of your intervention.
Do you mean the report is unrelated to the problem ??? No it isn't.
What 'we' packagers expect from users is to report to our bugzilla in
the case of they experience a problem.
That's at a very higher level of expectation that the same apply from
RPM Fusion contributors to the infrastructure team.
To me, your reading of the report is unaccurate, it has happened a lot
since the initial report. and the bug could have been closed for some
time but it's now reopened without anyone to notify the one in charge
of the buildsys infra.
The fact that the one assigned to the task isn't verbose as expected
is a very different and probably more individual problem. And I tend
to agree with the fact that the infrastrucuture team (which I don't
feal part of ). have to be more verbose about what is currently worked
on and what need to be done. Specially with the target that others
could give a hand.
Thx for understanding.
Nicolas (kwizart)
12:34 p.m.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:46:37 +0100, Nicolas wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:51:47 +0100, Nicolas wrote:
>
>> 2011/1/25 Julian Sikorski:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > if you go to http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/ you will see
>> > that dosemu and pdflib-lite have been in waiting state since forever.
>> > Just a heads up in an unlikely case I am the only one who noticed.
>> This time there is a bugreport already:
>>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1163
>>
>> Please use it.
>>
>> Nicolas (kwizart)
>
> Use it for what? It's a ticket opened on 2010-04-16 and referring back to
> "December last year", which means 2009. It doesn't tell anything
about
> what is wrong. No status update. Nothing. Is there a problem with Plague?
> Or just with the build target configuration on the builders?
I don't understand the meaning of your intervention.
Do you mean the report is unrelated to the problem ??? No it isn't.
Who can tell? The ticket is almost a year old and refers to even older
issues. Is it still the same problem? Have EL-5 builds worked some time
after that ticket in 2010? Nobody from Infra has answered in that ticket.
The ticket has never been closed either. It's open since 2010-04-16.
Has anything been done in response to the bug report?
What 'we' packagers expect from users is to report to our
bugzilla in
the case of they experience a problem.
Understandably. Still it isn't asked too much to take notice of
mailing-list threads like this. On a low-traffic list. I've unsubscribed
from the sysadmin list, which doesn't see any traffic at all. It's silent
for months. Is IRC the only place where one could lurk in hope of getting
status updates or insider details? IRC is pretty much a waste of time.
That's at a very higher level of expectation that the same apply
from
RPM Fusion contributors to the infrastructure team.
To me, your reading of the report is unaccurate, it has happened a lot
since the initial report. and the bug could have been closed for some
time but it's now reopened without anyone to notify the one in charge
of the buildsys infra.
The ticket's "activity log" doesn't say anything about
"reopened".
The first impression is that the ticket has been ignored.
Perhaps you refer to a different ticket than the one you linked?
The fact that the one assigned to the task isn't verbose as
expected
is a very different and probably more individual problem.
The assignee has _not_ responded at all.
5050
days inactive
5055
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Julian Sikorski -
Michael Schwendt -
Nicolas Chauvet -
solarflow99