https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-07-23 14:03:57 CEST --- I don't remember what previously was the dependency issue, but something weird seem still present: --> Traitement de la dépendance : libX11.so.6 pour le paquet : opera-12.00-2.fc16.x86_64 Whereas it should have be libX11.so.6()(64bit). That's probably because a 32bit binary remains bundled within the package. I guess this is related to: /usr/lib64/opera/pluginwrapper/operapluginwrapper-ia32-linux For Fedora EL in RPM Fusion. There are dedicated branches for each version of Fedora or EL. So you will need to update each branches and take into account the different version of RPM that will be used to build opera on each version. (mostly related to the dependency filtering scheme specially, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering ) One note about setting the RPM Vendor field. Fedora usually doesn't do that. A Vendor field is usually set on the buildsys level and not on a package level. But that's also because this fied is to be understood as Distributor of the package over been the Editor of the Software. URL, Summary and description are fields dedicated to the Software Editor instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.