[Bug 1313] New: Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 1313] New: Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

New packager

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package...

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 4 July 2010 Sun, 4 Jul '10

12:35 a.m.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Summary: Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/lightspark.spec SRPM : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/F13/lightspark-0.4.2-0.2.rc2.fc... Description: Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. Lightspark features: * JIT compilation of Actionscript to native x86 bytecode using LLVM * Hardware accelerated rendering using OpenGL Shaders (GLSL) * Very good and robust support for current-generation Actionscript 3 * A new, clean, codebase exploiting multithreading and optimized for modern hardware. Designed from scratch after the official Flash documentation was released. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

Show replies by date

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 4 July Sun, 4 Jul

1:37 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms(a)iinet.net.au --- Comment #1 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2010-07-04 03:37:30 --- (In reply to comment #0)

...

Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. Lightspark features:

You forgot to mention the reason why lightspark could not be in Fedora ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

1:39 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #2 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-04 03:39:17 --- (In reply to comment #1)

...

(In reply to comment #0) > Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. > Lightspark features: You forgot to mention the reason why lightspark could not be in Fedora ?

Because it needs ffmpeg -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

3:35 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #3 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2010-07-04 05:35:32 --- (In reply to comment #2)

...

Because it needs ffmpeg

Is it optional, or always required ? (Eg. swfdec is in fedora, and didn't need ffmpeg) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

11:47 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #4 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-04 13:47:20 --- (In reply to comment #3)

...

(In reply to comment #2) > Because it needs ffmpeg Is it optional, or always required ? (Eg. swfdec is in fedora, and didn't need ffmpeg)

It is a build time dependency, and is directly linked to. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Wednesday, 7 July Wed, 7 Jul

7:19 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Peter <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson(a)gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-07 21:19:16 --- (In reply to comment #3)

...

(In reply to comment #2) > Because it needs ffmpeg Is it optional, or always required ? (Eg. swfdec is in fedora, and didn't need ffmpeg)

swfdec uses gstreamer which means it can be installed without plugins so it would work with say the WebM codec when its more widespread and hence not needing h264. lightspark currently uses ffmpeg directly rather than gstreamer so it unfortunately has to be in rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Tuesday, 20 July Tue, 20 Jul

5:52 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #6 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-20 19:52:05 --- Update to 0.4.2 Final SPEC : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/lightspark.spec SRPM : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/F13/lightspark-0.4.2-1.fc13.src... Description: Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. Lightspark features: * JIT compilation of Actionscript to native x86 bytecode using LLVM * Hardware accelerated rendering using OpenGL Shaders (GLSL) * Very good and robust support for current-generation Actionscript 3 * A new, clean, codebase exploiting multithreading and optimized for modern hardware. Designed from scratch after the official Flash documentation was released. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Wednesday, 21 July Wed, 21 Jul

6:23 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sgallagh(a)fedoraproject.org --- Comment #7 from Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-07-21 20:23:41 --- *** Bug 1343 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

6:27 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

7:03 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #8 from Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-07-21 21:03:14 --- The Source is wrong. There is no tarball by that name. Please fix this. Also, there's no need to include the git snapshot portions, since there are stable tarball releases available. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

7:07 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #9 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-21 21:07:14 --- (In reply to comment #8)

...

The Source is wrong. There is no tarball by that name. Please fix this. Also, there's no need to include the git snapshot portions, since there are stable tarball releases available.

Source is : https://launchpad.net/~sssup/+archive/sssup-ppa/+files/lightspark_0.4.2.o... , and it exists The git snapshots portions are needed because I will frequently update to git snapshots -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

7:11 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #10 from Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-07-21 21:11:07 --- I think it makes more sense to use http://launchpad.net/lightspark/trunk/lightspark-0.4.2/+download/lightspa... This is the tarball linked from the project page. As for the git snapshots, it seems to me that it would be better to rely on applying patches to the previous stable release than pulling git snapshots regularly. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

7:16 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #11 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-21 21:16:39 --- (In reply to comment #10)

...

I think it makes more sense to use http://launchpad.net/lightspark/trunk/lightspark-0.4.2/+download/lightspa... This is the tarball linked from the project page.

I use the ppa link because it is used for rc too I may add another if to use the "official" tarball

...

As for the git snapshots, it seems to me that it would be better to rely on applying patches to the previous stable release than pulling git snapshots regularly.

I wish, but the project is highly active and backporting patches isn't trivial, as they rely on previous ones most of the time. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

7:19 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #12 from Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-07-21 21:19:05 --- Ok, if upstream is that highly active (and you're planning on keeping up with it - good luck to you), then the git stuff looks fine. I think it would be better to include an if for the final releases though. The download link is the "more official" version, so it would be better to use that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

7:21 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #13 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-21 21:21:06 --- (In reply to comment #12)

...

Ok, if upstream is that highly active (and you're planning on keeping up with it - good luck to you), then the git stuff looks fine. I think it would be better to include an if for the final releases though. The download link is the "more official" version, so it would be better to use that.

Ok, I will do -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

9:29 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #14 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-21 23:29:25 --- Fixed the source URL. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Saturday, 24 July Sat, 24 Jul

4:12 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #15 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-24 06:12:08 --- Update to 0.4.2.1, Bugfix release SPEC : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/lightspark.spec SRPM : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/F13/lightspark-0.4.2.1-1.fc13.s... Description: Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. Lightspark features: * JIT compilation of Actionscript to native x86 bytecode using LLVM * Hardware accelerated rendering using OpenGL Shaders (GLSL) * Very good and robust support for current-generation Actionscript 3 * A new, clean, codebase exploiting multithreading and optimized for modern hardware. Designed from scratch after the official Flash documentation was released. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

9:39 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de --- Comment #16 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de> 2010-07-24 11:39:49 --- (In reply to comment #15)

...

Update to 0.4.2.1, Bugfix release

Upstream now installs liblightspark.so.0.4.2 to (fixed) /usr/lib/lightspark. Besides the fact that thus the current specfile doesn't build on x86_64, that's bad from a multilib point of view. Furthermore, the library isn't found at runtime. The attached patches fix this. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

9:42 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de> 2010-07-24 11:42:58 --- Created an attachment (id=451) --> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=451) fixes lightspark's PRIVATELIBDIR setting -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

9:44 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de> 2010-07-24 11:44:22 --- Created an attachment (id=452) --> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=452) fixes lightspark's PRIVATELIBDIR setting -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Monday, 26 July Mon, 26 Jul

1:43 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |2 Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #19 from Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-07-26 15:43:32 --- Apologies. My $DAYJOB is getting overly busy and I do not have time to do this review after all. Resetting to RF_NEW so someone else can pick it up. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Tuesday, 27 July Tue, 27 Jul

12:58 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #20 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-27 14:58:00 --- Update to 0.4.2.2 : Add gnash fallback SPEC : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/lightspark.spec SRPM : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/lightspark-0.4.2.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. Lightspark features: * JIT compilation of Actionscript to native x86 bytecode using LLVM * Hardware accelerated rendering using OpenGL Shaders (GLSL) * Very good and robust support for current-generation Actionscript 3 * A new, clean, codebase exploiting multithreading and optimized for modern hardware. Designed from scratch after the official Flash documentation was released. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 1 August Sun, 1 Aug

2:57 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Carwyn Edwards <carwyn(a)carwyn.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carwyn(a)carwyn.com --- Comment #21 from Carwyn Edwards <carwyn(a)carwyn.com> 2010-08-01 16:56:56 --- (In reply to comment #20)

...

Update to 0.4.2.2 : Add gnash fallback

I'm not so keen on forcing users to install gnash: %package mozilla-plugin ... Requires: mozilla-filesystem gnash .. it can cause significant CPU load on some pages. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

3:01 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #22 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-01 17:01:47 --- (In reply to comment #21)

...

(In reply to comment #20) > Update to 0.4.2.2 : Add gnash fallback I'm not so keen on forcing users to install gnash: %package mozilla-plugin ... Requires: mozilla-filesystem gnash .. it can cause significant CPU load on some pages.

This is irrelevant here, you use flashblock or whatever the equivalent is on other browsers. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

3:18 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #23 from Carwyn Edwards <carwyn(a)carwyn.com> 2010-08-01 17:18:03 --- (In reply to comment #22)

...

This is irrelevant here, you use flashblock or whatever the equivalent is on other browsers.

To give some context, I'm coming from a University setting with 1000+ Fedora workstations and over 3000 users. Gnash is out of the question for us (stability and support costs) but we are finding lightspark promising. Flashblock etc. isn't really an option for us either as it asks things of the users. Easy enough for us to patch out the gnash requirement and put it in a local repo though. Just giving a different perspective. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

3:23 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #24 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-01 17:23:04 --- (In reply to comment #23)

...

(In reply to comment #22) > This is irrelevant here, you use flashblock or whatever the equivalent is on > other browsers. To give some context, I'm coming from a University setting with 1000+ Fedora workstations and over 3000 users. Gnash is out of the question for us (stability and support costs) but we are finding lightspark promising. Flashblock etc. isn't really an option for us either as it asks things of the users. Easy enough for us to patch out the gnash requirement and put it in a local repo though. Just giving a different perspective.

Gnash is necessary for complete youtube support since lightspark doesn't support avm1 swfs. We can remove gnash from the requirements, but then you will have to install it manually to have full youtube support. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

8:17 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #25 from Peter <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-01 22:17:10 --- (In reply to comment #24)

...

(In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > > This is irrelevant here, you use flashblock or whatever the equivalent is on > > other browsers. > > To give some context, I'm coming from a University setting with 1000+ Fedora > workstations and over 3000 users. > > Gnash is out of the question for us (stability and support costs) but we are > finding lightspark promising. Flashblock etc. isn't really an option for us > either as it asks things of the users. > > Easy enough for us to patch out the gnash requirement and put it in a local > repo though. > > Just giving a different perspective. > Gnash is necessary for complete youtube support since lightspark doesn't support avm1 swfs. We can remove gnash from the requirements, but then you will have to install it manually to have full youtube support.

I agree it shouldn't depend on it. I removed gnash long ago as its a CPU hog. If the person wants open flash support for older videos its likely they'll already have it installed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

8:19 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #26 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-01 22:19:22 --- (In reply to comment #25)

...

(In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > (In reply to comment #22) > > > > > This is irrelevant here, you use flashblock or whatever the equivalent is on > > > other browsers. > > > > To give some context, I'm coming from a University setting with 1000+ Fedora > > workstations and over 3000 users. > > > > Gnash is out of the question for us (stability and support costs) but we are > > finding lightspark promising. Flashblock etc. isn't really an option for us > > either as it asks things of the users. > > > > Easy enough for us to patch out the gnash requirement and put it in a local > > repo though. > > > > Just giving a different perspective. > > > > Gnash is necessary for complete youtube support since lightspark doesn't > support avm1 swfs. > > We can remove gnash from the requirements, but then you will have to install it > manually to have full youtube support. I agree it shouldn't depend on it. I removed gnash long ago as its a CPU hog. If the person wants open flash support for older videos its likely they'll already have it installed.

Ok, no problem, since rpm doesn't support recommends. Off Topic : gnash may end up in rpmfusion too to properly support hwaccel in 0.8.8 with the introduction of vaapi. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Monday, 2 August Mon, 2 Aug

1:35 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #27 from Chen Lei <supercyper(a)163.com> 2010-08-02 03:35:00 --- (In reply to comment #26)

...

Off Topic : gnash may end up in rpmfusion too to properly support hwaccel in 0.8.8 with the introduction of vaapi.

I think libva will be included in Fedora soon, because libvdpau is already accepted by FESCo. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Thursday, 5 August Thu, 5 Aug

3:35 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #28 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-05 17:35:57 --- Update to 0.4.2.3 SPEC : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/lightspark.spec SRPM : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/F13/lightspark-0.4.2.3-1.fc13.s... Description: Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. Lightspark features: * JIT compilation of Actionscript to native x86 bytecode using LLVM * Hardware accelerated rendering using OpenGL Shaders (GLSL) * Very good and robust support for current-generation Actionscript 3 * A new, clean, codebase exploiting multithreading and optimized for modern hardware. Designed from scratch after the official Flash documentation was released. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Tuesday, 10 August Tue, 10 Aug

6:29 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #29 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-10 20:29:55 --- Update to 0.4.3 SPEC : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/lightspark.spec SRPM : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/F13/lightspark-0.4.3-1.fc13.src... Description: Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. Lightspark features: * JIT compilation of Actionscript to native x86 bytecode using LLVM * Hardware accelerated rendering using OpenGL Shaders (GLSL) * Very good and robust support for current-generation Actionscript 3 * A new, clean, codebase exploiting multithreading and optimized for modern hardware. Designed from scratch after the official Flash documentation was released. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 29 August Sun, 29 Aug

10:45 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #30 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-30 00:45:12 --- Update to 0.4.4 SPEC : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/lightspark.spec SRPM : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/F13/lightspark-0.4.4-1.fc13.src... Description: Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. Lightspark features: * JIT compilation of Actionscript to native x86 bytecode using LLVM * Hardware accelerated rendering using OpenGL Shaders (GLSL) * Very good and robust support for current-generation Actionscript 3 * A new, clean, codebase exploiting multithreading and optimized for modern hardware. Designed from scratch after the official Flash documentation was released. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Tuesday, 31 August Tue, 31 Aug

6:42 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #31 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-31 08:42:55 --- I think It would be best if I can provide a flash alternative. But we depends on other flash handlers to provide alternatives too, see : https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-5339 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628804 I filed these bugs though the probability of getting it fixed is too small. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

6:21 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #32 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-31 20:21:35 --- No luck with alternatives. Users will have to remove other flash plugins. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Thursday, 2 September Thu, 2 Sep

10:39 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #33 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-03 00:39:28 --- Update to 0.4.4.1 SPEC : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/lightspark.spec SRPM : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/F13/lightspark-0.4.4.1-1.fc13.s... Description: Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. Lightspark features: * JIT compilation of Actionscript to native x86 bytecode using LLVM * Hardware accelerated rendering using OpenGL Shaders (GLSL) * Very good and robust support for current-generation Actionscript 3 * A new, clean, codebase exploiting multithreading and optimized for modern hardware. Designed from scratch after the official Flash documentation was released. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Friday, 10 September Fri, 10 Sep

2:10 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

2:10 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

2:11 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |rdieter(a)math.unl.edu |review(a)rpmfusion.org | Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

2:51 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #35 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> 2010-09-10 16:51:30 --- A few quick comments, 1. MUST: please include a separate lightspark.desktop Source, instead of cat'ing inline in the .spec 2. MUST: remove alternatives baggage (discussed on irc), Provides: flash-plugin 3. MUST: remove Requires: gnash , and document it's optional use in %%description insead (discussed on irc). I think it checks for this ability at buildtime too, may want BuildRequires: gnash so that it's found explicitly (else, seems to default to looking for /usr/bin/gnash , which is ok too). your call. 4. SHOULD: consider using GraphicsMagick or ImageMagick (or your favorite tool) to convert svg icons into 1 or 2 common-sized png's as well. otherwise, Naming: ok License: (tentative) ok (I see a few mentions of mpl/gplv2/lgplv2 in some headers, will have to double-check) scriptlets: ok sources: ok md5sum *.gz 20a9eaf9259915d6aa7fc39048aece78 lightspark-0.4.4.1.tar.gz So far so good. If you can address items 1-4, we're looking good. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

2:55 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #36 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> 2010-09-10 16:55:49 --- obligatory rpmlint, lightspark.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bytecode -> byte code, byte-code, byte lightspark.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codebase -> co debase, co-debase, code base lightspark.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreading -> multitasking, multitudinous, multiprocessing lightspark.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bytecode -> byte code, byte-code, byte lightspark.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codebase -> co debase, co-debase, code base lightspark.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multithreading -> multitasking, multitudinous, multiprocessing lightspark.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided lightspark-common lightspark-mozilla-plugin.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. mostly harmless to me. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Saturday, 11 September Sat, 11 Sep

10:35 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #37 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-12 00:35:19 --- I will try to fix 1) and 4) upstream -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

10:37 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #38 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-12 00:37:26 --- oh, and for : lightspark.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided lightspark-common it is just a transitional step from the lightspark-common that i was providing in the repo, once entering rpmfusion this will get removed of course. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 12 September Sun, 12 Sep

2:58 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #39 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-12 04:58:24 --- 1) and 4) have been fixed upstream : http://github.com/lightspark/lightspark/commit/d5548462d338820e5854aa5d61... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

3:46 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #40 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-12 17:46:31 --- should I : 1) Apply the patch using git 2) Add the icons and desktop as separate sources 3) Do a git snapshot instead of the release 4) Wait for 0.4.4.3 what option is better ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Monday, 13 September Mon, 13 Sep

12:53 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #41 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> 2010-09-13 14:53:38 --- I'm satisfied with option 4, knowing that the changes are upstreamed and will be included in coming releases. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

2:58 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #42 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-13 16:58:16 --- Update to 0.4.4.2 SPEC : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/lightspark.spec SRPM : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/lightspark/F13/lightspark-0.4.4.2-1.fc13.s... Description: Lightspark is a modern, free, open-source flash player implementation. Lightspark features: * JIT compilation of Actionscript to native x86 bytecode using LLVM * Hardware accelerated rendering using OpenGL Shaders (GLSL) * Very good and robust support for current-generation Actionscript 3 * A new, clean, codebase exploiting multithreading and optimized for modern hardware. Designed from scratch after the official Flash documentation was released. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

3:09 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

3:20 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 --- Comment #44 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-13 17:20:34 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: lightspark Short Description: An alternative Flash Player implementation Owners: hicham Branches: F-13 InitialCC: hicham ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Tuesday, 14 September Tue, 14 Sep

12:20 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier(a)bachelot.org Blocks| |33 --- Comment #45 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> 2010-09-14 14:20:45 --- Bugs waiting for a CVS request need to block bug #33. See http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-8354059095aca6ccb5494f9dac8815b732... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

3:01 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Wednesday, 15 September Wed, 15 Sep

6:52 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #46 from Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-15 20:52:40 --- Imported and successfully built. Thanks Rex. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

4972

days inactive

5045

days old

rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org

Manage subscription

50 comments

1 participants

tags (0)

participants (1)

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

[Bug 1313] New: Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation