============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: 1 sdlmess-0127-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/8: 1 sdlmess-0127-1.fc8 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 3 NEW libcapsimage-2.0.0-7.fc10 : Provides IPF support, primarily for UAE/E-UAE NEW ogre-cg-1.4.9-2.fc10 : Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine NEW sdlmess-0127-1.fc10 : SDL Multiple Emulator Super System ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: sdlmess-0127-1.fc9 ------------------ * Sat Aug 30 2008 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0127-1 - Updated to 0.127 - Dropped cheat_file and added cheatpath to the default ini ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/8: sdlmess-0127-1.fc8 ------------------ * Sat Aug 30 2008 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0127-1 - Updated to 0.127 - Dropped cheat_file and added cheatpath to the default ini ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: libcapsimage-2.0.0-7.fc10 ------------------------- * Fri Sep 05 2008 Xavier Lamien <lxtnow[at]gmail.com> - 2.0.0-7 - Rebuild for rpmfusion inclusion. ogre-cg-1.4.9-2.fc10 -------------------- * Mon Jul 14 2008 Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov(a)gmail.com&gt; 1.4.9-2 - Packaged OGRE 1.4.9 Cg plugin basing on Fedora package by Hans de Goede. sdlmess-0127-1.fc10 ------------------- * Sat Aug 30 2008 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0127-1 - Updated to 0.127 - Dropped cheat_file and added cheatpath to the default ini

On 28.09.2008 20:58, Mario Chacon wrote: > H!!. There is any chance to test rpm-fusion? Use on your own risk: rpm -ivh \ http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/testing/8/i386/rpmf... \ http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/testing/8/i386/rpmfusi... \ You can safely ignore that there is a 8 in the URL. Rawhide users use rpm -ivh \ http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/i386/os/rpmfusion-... \ http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/development/i386/os/rpmfusi... \

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Add-on: We have no fully configured bug tracker yet for RPM Fusion. As > such: please do *not* further distribute or link to above mail in > Blogs, Forums or other Mailing lists for now. We'll announce a > official testing phase for RPM Fusion once we have the important bits > in place. tia! Is it useful to do a new compose of the live cd by replacing Livna development with RPMFusion development repository?

On 30.09.2008 01:37, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> Add-on: We have no fully configured bug tracker yet for RPM Fusion. As >> such: please do *not* further distribute or link to above mail in Blogs, >> Forums or other Mailing lists for now. We'll announce a official testing >> phase for RPM Fusion once we have the important bits in place. tia! > > Is it useful to do a new compose of the live cd by replacing Livna > development with RPMFusion development repository? Please note that the compx.xml file is still in a flux and might complicate things a bit for you (e.g. you might need to adjust things again later); details in this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-September/msg02615... Not to mention that a whole lot of packages are not in any groups right now. But all of that likely is not a big problem. > I got precious little feedback but a lot of downloads on the last compose > so I would like to hear more opinions. Sorry, but I mostly ignored the whole spins discussions up to now :-/ I consider getting rpmfusion running way more important for now, that's why I focus on that right now; and the long discussion around a rpmfusion spin happened when I was on vacation. :-( Hence my questions maybe might have been answered already, but - where does the name omeaga come from? - will omega become the official RPM Fusion spin or just serve as base for one? - seems there are other people/groups/projects that have spins based on livna already; have any attempts been made to get all of them together at one table within the RPM Fusion project to bundle efforts? Please don't take those questions as offense -- I like the idea with the spin. I just want to understand the long term goals and plans better.

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hence my questions maybe might have been answered already, but > - where does the name omeaga come from? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega [...]

> - will omega become the official RPM Fusion spin or just serve as base > for one? I would like for it to be considered the official RPM Fusion spin. I posted the kickstart file for feedback before but everybody seemed busy with other things at that point so I just went ahead and got the ball rolling.

[...] > - seems there are other people/groups/projects that have spins based > on livna already; have any attempts been made to get all of them > together at one table within the RPM Fusion project to bundle efforts? If you let me know which groups, I can get in touch with them.

On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 17:20 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 30.09.2008 11:58, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > [...] >>> - seems there are other people/groups/projects that have spins based >>> on livna already; have any attempts been made to get all of them >>> together at one table within the RPM Fusion project to bundle efforts? >> If you let me know which groups, I can get in touch with them. > I don't know any. I just saw some posts on this lists from someone else > that afaics already has experience with creating spins that contain bits > from livna. Guilty. But also guilty of not giving any feedback on Rahul's initial ks file. Been swamped by $dayjob of late. Going to start working on a new F10-based spin w/a bunch of rpmfusion packages in it Real Soon Now though -- next MythDora release...

On 28.09.2008 20:58, Mario Chacon wrote: > H!!. There is any chance to test rpm-fusion? Use on your own risk:

Whoh!...Thanks man!...i would like to help some time as a maintainer package.!... Thanks for all!... On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info&gt; wrote: > On 29.09.2008 17:52, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> On 28.09.2008 20:58, Mario Chacon wrote: >>> >>> H!!. There is any chance to test rpm-fusion? >> >> Use on your own risk: > > New release rpm hit the repo. Please use commands like this to get them from > now on: > > === > > == rawhide == > > rpm -ivh > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-rawhide... > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-r... > > == Fedora 8 and 9 == > > rpm -ivh > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.... > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-s... > > === > > The plan is to let those symbolic links on the server side always point > to the latest release-rpms. But I have to create those links manually > each time something changes -- so if I forget that then please just let > me know by mail. tia! > > Cu > knurd >

On 29.09.2008 17:52, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 28.09.2008 20:58, Mario Chacon wrote: >> H!!. There is any chance to test rpm-fusion? > > Use on your own risk: New release rpm hit the repo. Please use commands like this to get them from now on: === == rawhide == rpm -ivh http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-rawhide.n oarch.rpm http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-raw hide.noarch.rpm == Fedora 8 and 9 == rpm -ivh http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.no arch.rpm http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-sta ble.noarch.rpm === The plan is to let those symbolic links on the server side always point to the latest release-rpms. But I have to create those links manually each time something changes -- so if I forget that then please just let me know by mail. tia!

Do you have yum-protectbase package?... I must have to remove it to update from RPM-Fusion.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > On Tuesday 30 September 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 29.09.2008 17:52, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> > On 28.09.2008 20:58, Mario Chacon wrote: >> >> H!!. There is any chance to test rpm-fusion? >> > >> > Use on your own risk: >> >> New release rpm hit the repo. Please use commands like this to get them >> from now on: >> >> === >> >> == rawhide == >> >> rpm -ivh >> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-rawhid >>e.n oarch.rpm >> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release- >>raw hide.noarch.rpm >> >> == Fedora 8 and 9 == >> >> rpm -ivh >> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable >>.no arch.rpm >> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release- >>sta ble.noarch.rpm >> >> === >> >> The plan is to let those symbolic links on the server side always point >> to the latest release-rpms. But I have to create those links manually >> each time something changes -- so if I forget that then please just let >> me know by mail. tia! > > Cool. Here's what I get: > yum update > ... > amarok-extras-freeworld-1.4.10-1.fc9.noarch from rpmfusion-free-updates- > testing has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: libtunepimp-extras-freeworld is needed by > package amarok-extras-freeworld-1.4.10-1.fc9.noarch > (rpmfusion-free-updates-testing) Error: Missing Dependency: > libtunepimp-extras-freeworld is needed by package > amarok-extras-freeworld-1.4.10-1.fc9.noarch > (rpmfusion-free-updates-testing)

On Tuesday 30 September 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 29.09.2008 17:52, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 28.09.2008 20:58, Mario Chacon wrote: >>> H!!. There is any chance to test rpm-fusion? >> Use on your own risk: > New release rpm hit the repo. Please use commands like this to get them > from now on: > > === > > == rawhide == > > rpm -ivh > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-rawhide.n > oarch.rpm > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-raw > hide.noarch.rpm > > == Fedora 8 and 9 == > > rpm -ivh > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.no > arch.rpm > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-sta > ble.noarch.rpm > > === > > The plan is to let those symbolic links on the server side always point > to the latest release-rpms. But I have to create those links manually > each time something changes -- so if I forget that then please just let > me know by mail. tia! > Cool. Here's what I get: yum update ... amarok-extras-freeworld-1.4.10-1.fc9.noarch from rpmfusion-free-updates- testing has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libtunepimp-extras-freeworld is needed by package amarok-extras-freeworld-1.4.10-1.fc9.noarch (rpmfusion-free-updates-testing) Error: Missing Dependency: libtunepimp-extras-freeworld is needed by package amarok-extras-freeworld-1.4.10-1.fc9.noarch (rpmfusion-free-updates-testing)