8:40 p.m.
FFmpeg 0.7.2 was released on 2011-07-28. Among others bugfixes, the
update fixes one security flaw in the Matroska demuxer (MSVR-11-0080).
The 0.7 series uses the old ABI, so nothing should break.
Regards,
Marcos
8:53 p.m.
2011/7/31 Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello <marcosfrm(a)gmail.com>:
FFmpeg 0.7.2 was released on 2011-07-28. Among others bugfixes, the
update fixes one security flaw in the Matroska demuxer (MSVR-11-0080).
The 0.7 series uses the old ABI, so nothing should break.
The problem is that 0.7 stable requires x264 > 115 where we only have 114.
Here is a break.
That been said, we should probably update to this ABI in F15 for x264
as a preliminary step to continue to follow the 0.7.x ffmpeg branch
there.
Marcos, I you want to help in this area, please consider joining the
Fedora or RPM Fusion Contributors:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors
Thx
Nicolas (kwizart)
10:35 p.m.
2011/7/31 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com>:
The problem is that 0.7 stable requires x264 > 115 where we only
have 114.
Here is a break.
Thanks for pointing this out. I missed your previous email on the subject.
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-July/00987...
(I'll test rpmfusion-free-updates-testing)
That been said, we should probably update to this ABI in F15 for
x264
as a preliminary step to continue to follow the 0.7.x ffmpeg branch
there.
I think so. It's important keep FFmpeg updated with its maintenance releases.
Marcos, I you want to help in this area, please consider joining the
Fedora or RPM Fusion Contributors:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors
Thx
For now I think the ML is enough.
Regards,
Marcos
3:49 p.m.
Hi,
On Sunday, 31 July 2011 at 22:53, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2011/7/31 Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello <marcosfrm(a)gmail.com>:
> FFmpeg 0.7.2 was released on 2011-07-28. Among others bugfixes, the
> update fixes one security flaw in the Matroska demuxer (MSVR-11-0080).
>
> The 0.7 series uses the old ABI, so nothing should break.
>
The problem is that 0.7 stable requires x264 > 115 where we only have 114.
Here is a break.
That been said, we should probably update to this ABI in F15 for x264
as a preliminary step to continue to follow the 0.7.x ffmpeg branch
there.
I'll try to find some time to prepare the updates till the end of the week.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
1:06 a.m.
2011/8/10 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>:
Hi,
On Sunday, 31 July 2011 at 22:53, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2011/7/31 Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello <marcosfrm(a)gmail.com>:
> > FFmpeg 0.7.2 was released on 2011-07-28. Among others bugfixes, the
> > update fixes one security flaw in the Matroska demuxer (MSVR-11-0080).
> >
> > The 0.7 series uses the old ABI, so nothing should break.
> >
> The problem is that 0.7 stable requires x264 > 115 where we only have 114.
> Here is a break.
>
> That been said, we should probably update to this ABI in F15 for x264
> as a preliminary step to continue to follow the 0.7.x ffmpeg branch
> there.
I'll try to find some time to prepare the updates till the end of the week.
I don't want to rush anyone, but do you have any news on this?
Marcos
10:18 p.m.
On Wednesday, 31 August 2011 at 03:06, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello wrote:
2011/8/10 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
<dominik(a)greysector.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday, 31 July 2011 at 22:53, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> 2011/7/31 Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello <marcosfrm(a)gmail.com>:
>> > FFmpeg 0.7.2 was released on 2011-07-28. Among others bugfixes, the
>> > update fixes one security flaw in the Matroska demuxer (MSVR-11-0080).
>> >
>> > The 0.7 series uses the old ABI, so nothing should break.
>> >
>> The problem is that 0.7 stable requires x264 > 115 where we only have 114.
>> Here is a break.
>>
>> That been said, we should probably update to this ABI in F15 for x264
>> as a preliminary step to continue to follow the 0.7.x ffmpeg branch
>> there.
>
> I'll try to find some time to prepare the updates till the end of the week.
>
I don't want to rush anyone, but do you have any news on this?
Yeah, I went locally through all dependent packages on F-14 and patched them
where necessary, so F14 is ready to be pushed, but we need to do devel/F-16
first, then F-15 and then F-14.
I've been working through F-16/devel packages in my spare time, but many
packages need porting to FFmpeg-0.8 API so it takes a while. 18 packages
are done, 16 are still pending.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
4866
days inactive
4897
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski -
Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello -
Nicolas Chauvet