https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2775 Bug #: 2775 Summary: Review request: Mplayer2 - An advanced general-purpose video player. Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kprasad(a)gmx.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org # Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package. http://www.freeuploadsite.com/do.php?id=10717 # A short description for the package. mplayer2 is an advanced general-purpose video player. A fork of the original MPlayer project, it contains significant further development and supports a number of features not available in other Unix players. # Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. This package does not meet Fedora's strict license policy. This package functionality is equivalent to the original Mplayer (mplayer v1). # The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for each message why you've chosen to ignore it. $rpmlint mplayer2.spec ../SRPMS/mplayer2-2.0-20130309git.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/mplayer2-* mplayer2.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 20130309git ['2.0-20130309git', '2.0-20130309git'] (I guess this is due to initial version) mplayer2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary midentify.sh (There's no doc file associated with this script in the source) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. # Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package. Yes, this is my first package submission. # Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. Since I'm not sponsored packager, I need a sponsor. Thanks, Prasad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.