On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next week. I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine which packages still need to be rebuilt?

Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac, audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages. Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.

I know sox-plugins-{freeworld,nonfree} need to be updated for F22+ but it requires a patch to expose two more private symbols (after upstream hid them in 14.4.2). I have contacted Fedora sox maintainers but haven't gotten a response yet. I actually submitted a bug upstream but it has gotten *ZERO* response so I spent 3 hours figuring it out which my $DAYJOB unknowingly sponsored. Thanks, Richard

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; >> wrote: >> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they >> wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ >> ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them >> for rebuild next week. >> >> >> >> I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine >> which packages still need to be rebuilt? > > > >> >> Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their >> latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac, >> audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers >> contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview >> repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages. >> >> Best would be to make a general review of missing updates. >> > I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild , > I'll try send the list this afternoon. > > Also got some other information about package that are missing (not > enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji > system . 1- query all rpmfusion package and date it : repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 --disablerepo=rawhide,fedora\*,updates\*,peem-kde4-fedora,sergiomb-vboxfor23 -a --qf "%{buildtime:isodate} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}" > listall.txt 2 - all build times of package with tag fc23 are after 2015-10-24 , so no need to rebuild: cat listall.txt | grep fc23 | sort -nr 3 - packages to rebuild (are the packages with fc22 tag): cat listall.txt | grep fc22 | cut -b 21- | xargs repoquery --source | sort -u after pipe with perl -pe 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' we got the list in attachment 4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag: cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23" Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1 more buildsys and releases packages

Hi, On Dom, 2015-11-08 at 15:17 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >>>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they >>>> wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ >>>> ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them >>>> for rebuild next week. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine >>>> which packages still need to be rebuilt? >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their >>>> latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac, >>>> audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers >>>> contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview >>>> repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages. >>>> >>>> Best would be to make a general review of missing updates. >>>> >>> I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild , >>> I'll try send the list this afternoon. >>> >>> Also got some other information about package that are missing (not >>> enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji >>> system . >> >> 1- query all rpmfusion package and date it : >> repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 --disablerepo=rawhide,fedora\*,updates\*,peem-kde4-fedora,sergiomb-vboxfor23 -a --qf "%{buildtime:isodate} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}" > listall.txt >> >> 2 - all build times of package with tag fc23 are after 2015-10-24 , so no need to rebuild: >> cat listall.txt | grep fc23 | sort -nr >> >> 3 - packages to rebuild (are the packages with fc22 tag): >> cat listall.txt | grep fc22 | cut -b 21- | xargs repoquery --source | sort -u >> after pipe with perl -pe 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' we got the list in attachment >> >> 4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag: >> cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23" >> Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1 more buildsys and >> releases packages > > Sergio, Thanks for generating the list (attached to Sergio's original mail) but I do not > think this is what Nicolas had in mind, AFAICT Nicolas only wants to rebuild packages > which must be rebuilt due to c++ ABI changes and keep the rest as is. So not rebuild > all packages which have not been rebuild yet. Thanks but I thought that is to follow Fedora and it was all packages [1], I ask that at the time. Anyway, Nicolas mention an provenpackager, I don't mind take care of the mass rebuild , just need some instructions and the OK from Nicolas. Another topic, that I not take care, is the packages that need matching their fedora counterpart , can someone list it ? , are they only all freeworld packages ? or we have exceptions ?

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; > > wrote: > > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they > > wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ > > ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them > > for rebuild next week. > > > > > > > > I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine > > which packages still need to be rebuilt? > > > > > > > Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their > > latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac, > > audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers > > contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview > > repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages. > > > > Best would be to make a general review of missing updates. > > > I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild , > I'll try send the list this afternoon. > > Also got some other information about package that are missing (not > enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji > system . 1- query all rpmfusion package and date it : repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 --disablerepo=rawhide,fedora\*,updates\*,peem-kde4-fedora,sergiomb-vboxfor23 -a --qf "%{buildtime:isodate} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}" > listall.txt 2 - all build times of package with tag fc23 are after 2015-10-24 , so no need to rebuild: cat listall.txt | grep fc23 | sort -nr 3 - packages to rebuild (are the packages with fc22 tag): cat listall.txt | grep fc22 | cut -b 21- | xargs repoquery --source | sort -u after pipe with perl -pe 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' we got the list in attachment 4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag: cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23" Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1 more buildsys and releases packages Last note multilibs have problems, for example x265 [1] , to workaround this issue, I had repoquery i386 arch with --archlist=i386,i686 It would have been nice to split it between free and nonfree, but I can

From this list, can someone check that there is no needed update ?

I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others. There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next week. Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac, audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages. Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.

That would help me to concentrate on infra tasks. Then it will be possible to introduce new packages that will be git only (to answear the question from Mohamed). Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

2015-11-07 20:45 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com&gt;: On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 12:07 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others. > > > > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't > updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. > If someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next > week. > > > Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their latest > upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac, > audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers contact > provenpackager (that have access to the git preview repo) so they can > fetch the update of theses packages. > > Best would be to make a general review of missing updates. > Also we need mock for F23 ! Ok, and what need to be done to have it ? https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/mock-rpmfusion

-- - Nicolas (kwizart)

Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.

Hi, while at it, can someone please update http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors with links to git, or where the new work should be done?