http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at&gt; 2008-12-28 20:10:09 --- Ugh, why does this only support the obsolete ogm container and not the current ogg/ogv one (which has supported video for years, in a cleaner way than ogm - the Xiph folks say ogm is a broken hack)? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera <hadess(a)hadess.net&gt; 2009-02-03 11:49:38 --- (In reply to comment #1) # outputs OGM, AVI, MP4, or Matroska files I guess there's now a problem with your question :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #5 from Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-02-09 15:39:36 --- New upstream version is out: spec: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/ogmrip.spec SRPM: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/ogmrip-0.12.3-1.fc10.src.rpm @Kevin: I queries upstream here: http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2976427&forum_id=258033 Feel free to chime in if the reply is not satisfying... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #7 from Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-02-10 08:56:33 --- (In reply to comment #6) Why not... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |2 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #10 from Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-04-17 09:37:35 --- (In reply to comment #9) Yeah, sorry it was -2: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/ogmrip-0.12.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #12 from Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-04-28 01:00:13 --- (In reply to comment #9) these were fixed (In reply to comment #11) I'm a bit confused: I require tesseract for spell checking, isn't that enough? done http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/ogmrip-0.12.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |4 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #14 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org&gt; 2009-04-30 23:13:34 --- +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. ogmrip.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ogmrip.schemas ogmrip-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 11a52e5d9d7f936ae3a1925b5ab51b72 [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [+] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | --- Comment #16 from Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info&gt; 2009-05-01 10:55:32 --- (In reply to comment #15) done -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.