On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 19:20 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/1/1 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
...
>> install -m 0755 -D %{SOURCE10} \
>> - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/
>> + $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/vboxweb-service
>
> install -m 0755 -D %{SOURCE10} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/%{SOURCE10}
> is more logic for me.
This ends to have /etc/init.d/builddir/build/SOURCES/vboxweb-service
which will not work.
It could use $(basename ${SOURCE10}) but then there is no interest in
using install -D at first step.
ouch, my fault sorry.
...
> About rename to VirtualBox
>
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1826
>
> may I just change .spec
> Name: VirtualBox-OSE
> to
> Name: VirtualBox
> and keep same cvs locations ?
Nope - You will need to create another review and obsolete the previous package.
Anyway what the interest of that ? I don't see any.
You can still use a virtual provide for VirtualBox or virtualbox.
Is just about naming of package, "adopted the new
naming convention"
Now, rpm -q VirtualBox
package VirtualBox is not installed
and rpm -q VirtualBox-OSE
VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.8-1.fc16.x86_64
when we want the opposite
We just have to change the name of the package, it already installed
in /usr/lib64/virtualbox
--
Sérgio M. B.