Hi, Given that FFmpeg was updated without all dependencies fixed to work with it, I will try to make our devel repository to point to branched/F-20 instead of rawhide. (which should point to F-21 packages already) Please remind that I'm not going to update the mock config accordingly, so this will lead to a difference betweek your mock build and the buildsys. I will also issue a mass rebuild once most of the packages got fixed and branch before the middle of September. Please fix your package and others failing packages by requesting ACL if needed. Nicolas (kwizart)

I've fixed libquicktime, gstreamer1-libav and frogatto (for new boost, not ffmpeg, building now). But it seems something has gone wrong with gstreamer1-libav, the build completed successfully, but: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/**plague-results/fedora-** development-rpmfusion_free/**gstreamer1-libav/1.1.3-2.fc20/<http://bui... only has debuginfo rpms, and the logs at: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/**logs/fedora-development-** rpmfusion_free/18240-**gstreamer1-libav-1.1.3-2.fc20/<http://buildsys.... are also incomplete, maybe the disk is full ?

If you want me to help with other packages, a list of packages needing work would be useful.

2013/8/27 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w(a)public.gmane.org <mailto:j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>> ... I've fixed libquicktime, gstreamer1-libav and frogatto (for new boost, not ffmpeg, building now). But it seems something has gone wrong with gstreamer1-libav, the build completed successfully, but: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/__plague-results/fedora-__development-rpmfu... <http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/plague-results/fedora-development-rpmfusion... only has debuginfo rpms, and the logs at: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/__logs/fedora-development-__rpmfusion_free/... <http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/1824... are also incomplete, maybe the disk is full ? The disk isn't full, but the changes to track the fedora development/f20 repository instead of rawhide was not completed. Please bump and resubmit a new job to test if everything went right this time (you shouldn't have any build with .fc21). If you want me to help with other packages, a list of packages needing work would be useful. The failure page is probably helpful http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/failed.psp Search for the recent failure submited by me. I can eventually requeue the build if a previous dependency has succeeded. Nicolas (kwizart)

On 08/28/2013 07:29 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 27.08.2013 13:47, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: >> 2013/8/27 Hans de Goede >> <j.w.r.degoede-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w(a)public.gmane.org >> <mailto:j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>> >> ... >> >> >> I've fixed libquicktime, gstreamer1-libav and frogatto (for new >> boost, not ffmpeg, building now). >> >> But it seems something has gone wrong with gstreamer1-libav, the >> build completed successfully, but: >> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/__plague-results/fedora-__development-rpmfu... >> < http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/plague-results/fedora-development-rpmfusion... > >> only has debuginfo rpms, and the logs at: >> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/__logs/fedora-development-__rpmfusion_free/... >> < http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/1824... > >> are also incomplete, maybe the disk is full ? >> >> The disk isn't full, but the changes to track the fedora development/f20 >> repository instead of rawhide was not completed. >> Please bump and resubmit a new job to test if everything went right this >> time (you shouldn't have any build with .fc21). >> >> >> >> >> >> If you want me to help with other packages, a list of packages >> needing work would be useful. >> >> The failure page is probably helpful >> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/failed.psp >> Search for the recent failure submited by me. >> I can eventually requeue the build if a previous dependency has succeeded. >> >> Nicolas (kwizart) > Also see my earlier e-mail, I have posted the results of local rebuild > > Best regards, > Julian > Here's a patch that allows xine-lib-extras-freeworld to build. Regards, Xavier

On 08/29/2013 12:14 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Yep but BTW what to do with xine-lib 1.2 ? I've not tried to rebuild and thus neither to possibly fix xine-lib 1.2 if needed. I'll take a look.

Hi, Given that FFmpeg was updated without all dependencies fixed to work with it, I will try to make our devel repository to point to branched/F-20 instead of rawhide. (which should point to F-21 packages already) Please remind that I'm not going to update the mock config accordingly, so this will lead to a difference betweek your mock build and the buildsys. I will also issue a mass rebuild once most of the packages got fixed and branch before the middle of September.