On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2012/4/10 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2012/4/10 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)rpmfusion.org>:
>>> Author: hobbes1069
>>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/libfame/EL-6
>>> In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv11440
>>> Modified Files:
>>> Log Message:
>>> * Tue Apr 10 2012 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 0.9.1-15
>>> - Move static librari to a separate package as required by the Fedora
>>> packaging guidelines.
>> Why aren't you just disabling the static file anyway ?
> Although unlikely, I wasn't absolutely sure that no one was using them
> so I went with the least disruptive change. If no one complains after
> a while, we can drop them.
That kind of 'disruptive change' is more likely to be expected in a
fedora version before.
Can you please sync your changes to devel and F-17. I don't see any
interest in having an update for earlier branches. (either creating a
compat sub-package or disabling it).
I will, but we may not need to...
Can you list the packages that would still use libfame ?
I can't find anything that uses it, although my repoquery-fu may not
be good enough. I thought we needed it for MythTV but I can't find
anything in "repoquery --requires mythtv\*" that shows it does. I've
commented it out of the BuildRequires: and I'm building now. It may be
left over from an earlier version.
If nothing uses it, do we need to keep it around? It hasn't been
updated in a LONG time.
PS: BTW, I'm working on ffmpeg-compat for EL-6, to be reviewed
I'll take a look as soon as I can, just been a bit busy lately.