8:45 p.m.
2012/4/10 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)rpmfusion.org>:
Author: hobbes1069
Update of /cvs/free/rpms/libfame/EL-6
In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv11440
Modified Files:
libfame.spec
Log Message:
* Tue Apr 10 2012 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 0.9.1-15
- Move static librari to a separate package as required by the Fedora
packaging guidelines.
Why aren't you just disabling the static file anyway ?
Nicolas (kwizart)
8:54 p.m.
New subject: rpms/libfame/EL-6 libfame.spec,1.4,1.5
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2012/4/10 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)rpmfusion.org>:
> Author: hobbes1069
>
> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/libfame/EL-6
> In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv11440
>
> Modified Files:
> libfame.spec
> Log Message:
> * Tue Apr 10 2012 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 0.9.1-15
> - Move static librari to a separate package as required by the Fedora
> packaging guidelines.
Why aren't you just disabling the static file anyway ?
Although unlikely, I wasn't absolutely sure that no one was using them
so I went with the least disruptive change. If no one complains after
a while, we can drop them.
Richard
9:17 p.m.
New subject: rpms/libfame/EL-6 libfame.spec,1.4,1.5
2012/4/10 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nicolas Chauvet
<kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/4/10 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)rpmfusion.org>:
>> Author: hobbes1069
>>
>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/libfame/EL-6
>> In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv11440
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> libfame.spec
>> Log Message:
>> * Tue Apr 10 2012 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 0.9.1-15
>> - Move static librari to a separate package as required by the Fedora
>> packaging guidelines.
> Why aren't you just disabling the static file anyway ?
Although unlikely, I wasn't absolutely sure that no one was using them
so I went with the least disruptive change. If no one complains after
a while, we can drop them.
That kind of 'disruptive change' is more likely to be expected in a
fedora version before.
Can you please sync your changes to devel and F-17. I don't see any
interest in having an update for earlier branches. (either creating a
compat sub-package or disabling it).
Can you list the packages that would still use libfame ?
Nicolas (kwizart)
PS: BTW, I'm working on ffmpeg-compat for EL-6, to be reviewed ASAP.
7:31 p.m.
New subject: rpms/libfame/EL-6 libfame.spec,1.4,1.5
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2012/4/10 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2012/4/10 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)rpmfusion.org>:
>>> Author: hobbes1069
>>>
>>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/libfame/EL-6
>>> In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv11440
>>>
>>> Modified Files:
>>> libfame.spec
>>> Log Message:
>>> * Tue Apr 10 2012 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 0.9.1-15
>>> - Move static librari to a separate package as required by the Fedora
>>> packaging guidelines.
>> Why aren't you just disabling the static file anyway ?
>
> Although unlikely, I wasn't absolutely sure that no one was using them
> so I went with the least disruptive change. If no one complains after
> a while, we can drop them.
That kind of 'disruptive change' is more likely to be expected in a
fedora version before.
Can you please sync your changes to devel and F-17. I don't see any
interest in having an update for earlier branches. (either creating a
compat sub-package or disabling it).
I will, but we may not need to...
Can you list the packages that would still use libfame ?
I can't find anything that uses it, although my repoquery-fu may not
be good enough. I thought we needed it for MythTV but I can't find
anything in "repoquery --requires mythtv\*" that shows it does. I've
commented it out of the BuildRequires: and I'm building now. It may be
left over from an earlier version.
If nothing uses it, do we need to keep it around? It hasn't been
updated in a LONG time.
PS: BTW, I'm working on ffmpeg-compat for EL-6, to be reviewed
ASAP.
I'll take a look as soon as I can, just been a bit busy lately.
Thanks,
Richard
7:44 p.m.
New subject: rpms/libfame/EL-6 libfame.spec,1.4,1.5
Ok, I just verified MythTV doesn't need libfame... What should we do?
I can go ahead and build for F16 & F17 to harmonize it with EL6, but
I'm guessing it should be retired.
Richard
8:17 p.m.
New subject: rpms/libfame/EL-6 libfame.spec,1.4,1.5
2012/4/11 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>:
Ok, I just verified MythTV doesn't need libfame... What should we
do?
I can go ahead and build for F16 & F17 to harmonize it with EL6, but
I'm guessing it should be retired.
Disabling the static would be enought, and
again, I don't see the
point to have an update in F-16.
Nicolas (kwizart)
8:44 p.m.
New subject: rpms/libfame/EL-6 libfame.spec,1.4,1.5
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2012/4/11 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>:
> Ok, I just verified MythTV doesn't need libfame... What should we do?
> I can go ahead and build for F16 & F17 to harmonize it with EL6, but
> I'm guessing it should be retired.
Disabling the static would be enought, and again, I don't see the
point to have an update in F-16.
Done.
Richard
4392
days inactive
4393
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
6 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Nicolas Chauvet -
Richard Shaw