11:53 p.m.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
Bug #: 3863
Summary: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for
game data files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Various games are divided into two logical parts: engine and data.
.
game-data-packager is a tool which builds .rpm files for game
data which cannot be distributed (such as commercial game data).
Almost all ScummVM, Doom, Quake games are supported + others.
http://pkg-games.alioth.debian.org/game-data/
-------------
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/tool...
The RPM support has been added _after_ the last release,
so I temporary use dummy snapshot tarballs until next release.
These are built this way:
git archive --prefix=game-data-packager/ --format tar.gz master >
../rpmbuild/SOURCES/game-data-packager.tar.gz
Which makes rmplint complain:
"game-data-packager.src: W: invalid-url Source0: game-data-packager.tar.gz"
-------------
This tool originated in Debian "contrib", because it's
free software, but of no use without non-free assets;
likewise it doesn't belong in Fedora.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279177 :
"game-data-packager's sole purpose is to repackage non-free game resources into
distro packages. As such it has no place in Fedora itself."
---------------------------
remaining rpmlint:
game-data-packager.noarch: E: zero-length
/etc/game-data-packager/quake3-mirrors
well, maybe GDP should use data from filewatcher to enhance it's mirror
lists.
either at build-time (bad, need internet acces), from time to time,
or at run time. We have SHA1 hashes for files, so the source doesn't
much matter.
http://www.filewatcher.com/m/linuxq3apoint-1.32b-3.x86.run.30923961-0.html
game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/game-data-packager
that's not a script intended to be run,
but a script fragement to be sourced
game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/games/__init__.py
game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/version.py
game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/paths.py
these are generated during the build, a shebang could be added too
-----
This is my first RPM Fusion package.
-------
upstream Makefile lacks a "make install" rule;
having this would allow to trim the specfile.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2015-11-20
00:55:02 CET ---
SRPM:
https://github.com/a-detiste/fedora/raw/3fd6fd228dcdf175e372cd641c26a544f...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11:56 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9:46 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2015-11-20
10:46:03 CET ---
I added a 'make install' target to the upstream Makefile
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/commit/?i...
Handling of man-pages is maybe not optimal.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12:07 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com
Blocks|2 |3
AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com
|mfusion.org |
--- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-27 13:07:17 CET
---
Hi,
Sorry for being slow in reviewing this. It has been a bit busy lately, but I've
time now.
Overall the spec file looks good, a few remarks:
1) You mix Recommends and Suggests, according to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/WeakDependencies
Suggests are pretty much ignored under Fedora atm. So you may want to change
most Suggests into Recommends, at least for those Suggests which are available
as Fedora packages in the standard Fedora repos.
2) The %install section is quite long, you say that you've added a "make
install" target upstream, it would be good to use this in the next version
3) The "%clean" section is obsolete, and also it is not intended to do a
"make
clean" but to remove the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT aka the "make install" DESTDIR.
4) I see no license files in the %files sections. I guess since this comes from
Debian that it relies on the shared versions of the GPL text used in Debian, in
Fedora we ship a single license file per package, it would be good if you could
add the GPLv2 txt to the upstream tarbal (typically called COPYING) and add a
"%license COPYING" to the file-list for both the main and the
doom2-masterlevels packages.
Regards,
Hans
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8:48 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-29
09:48:57 CET ---
1) You mix Recommends and Suggests, according to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/WeakDependencies
Suggests are pretty much ignored under Fedora atm. So you may want to change
most Suggests into Recommends, at least for those Suggests which are available
as Fedora packages in the standard Fedora repos.
The suggests vs recommends were carefully picked.
Suggests does the same thing on Debian (ie: about nothing but preventing
auto-removals and show this info in management UI's & packages website).
Some uncommon extractor is only needed for the Japanese demo of one game out of
200 for example.
'unzip' is only needed to patch Wolf3D 1.0 to Wolf3D 1.2 for example;
the newer zip archives are processed with native Python modules.
The tool has extensive runtime checking for missing tools and will
print out appropriate command needed to install missing tools.
See at the end of build.py:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/game...
In the future we'd need to add suggests for 'steam', 'steamcmd'
& 'xdelta' and maybe even more.
----
steamcmd is a pain to make working, so you may want to copy this script:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/steamcmd.git/tree/debian/scripts...
3) The "%clean" section is obsolete, and also it is not
intended to do a "make
clean" but to remove the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT aka the "make install" DESTDIR.
Ok
2) The %install section is quite long, you say that you've added
a "make
install" target upstream, it would be good to use this in the next version
4) I see no license files in the %files sections.
Both of those will be fixed in the proper v44 release tarball;
the first cross-distro release. ... but I'm not responsible
for publishing the releases.
I can ask to release now if that doesn't conflict against other
project goals; like the half-done inclusion of Unreal & UT support
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/12/msg00372.html .
Or if you prefer we can publish a git snapshot right away;
name it v44~rc1 or something.
(I'd prefer, but I don't know what that involves)
Greets
Alexandre
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:17 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-29
10:17:29 CET ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_pac...
According to this pre-release could be:
game-data-packager-44-0.1
(there's no "%{alphatag}" here)
?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:05 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-29 13:05:02 CET
---
(In reply to comment #4)
>1) You mix Recommends and Suggests, according to:
>
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/WeakDependencies
>
>Suggests are pretty much ignored under Fedora atm. So you may want to change
>most Suggests into Recommends, at least for those Suggests which are available
>as Fedora packages in the standard Fedora repos.
The suggests vs recommends were carefully picked.
Suggests does the same thing on Debian (ie: about nothing but preventing
auto-removals and show this info in management UI's & packages website).
Some uncommon extractor is only needed for the Japanese demo of one game out of
200 for example.
'unzip' is only needed to patch Wolf3D 1.0 to Wolf3D 1.2 for example;
the newer zip archives are processed with native Python modules.
The tool has extensive runtime checking for missing tools and will
print out appropriate command needed to install missing tools.
See at the end of build.py:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/game...
In the future we'd need to add suggests for 'steam', 'steamcmd'
& 'xdelta' and maybe even more.
----
steamcmd is a pain to make working, so you may want to copy this script:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/steamcmd.git/tree/debian/scripts...
> 3) The "%clean" section is obsolete, and also it is not intended to do a
"make
> clean" but to remove the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT aka the "make install"
DESTDIR.
Ok
> 2) The %install section is quite long, you say that you've added a "make
> install" target upstream, it would be good to use this in the next version
>
> 4) I see no license files in the %files sections.
Both of those will be fixed in the proper v44 release tarball;
the first cross-distro release. ... but I'm not responsible
for publishing the releases.
I can ask to release now if that doesn't conflict against other
project goals; like the half-done inclusion of Unreal & UT support
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/12/msg00372.html .
Or if you prefer we can publish a git snapshot right away;
name it v44~rc1 or something.
(I'd prefer, but I don't know what that involves)
I think that going with a git snapshot for now would be good.
(In reply to comment #5)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_pac...
According to this pre-release could be:
game-data-packager-44-0.1
(there's no "%{alphatag}" here)
Right, so assuming you go with a git snapshot du-jour without giving it a tag
like "rc1" the new srpm would version would be:
game-data-packager-44-0.1.git$(DATA)$(HASH)
See e.g.:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xorg-x11-drv-ati.git/tree/xorg-x11-drv...
For how to handle this, note that spec file supports both git snapshots and
release tarbals, you can simplify things by only supporting git snapshots for
now, and simply switching to tarbals once a tarbal with all the necessary bits
is available, or if you expect to have a use for git snapshots in the future
too you can use the same approach.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:24 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-29
14:24:58 CET ---
Ok let's do that.
I've pushed the changes to my GitHub mirror, not yet on Debian official server.
This way I can still do a "git push --force" there if I want
& official repos stay at 06f1b80.
https://github.com/a-detiste/game-data-packager/commit/8ce9d1693119660568...
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12343148
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:47 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-29 14:47:12 CET
---
Hi,
(In reply to comment #7)
Ok let's do that.
I've pushed the changes to my GitHub mirror, not yet on Debian official server.
This way I can still do a "git push --force" there if I want
& official repos stay at 06f1b80.
https://github.com/a-detiste/game-data-packager/commit/8ce9d1693119660568...
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12343148
Looks good, but it seems that you've not yet switched to using "make
install",
instead of the diy install ?
Regards,
Hans
p.s.
Be careful with submitting scratch builds of rpmfusion pkgs to
koji.fedoraproject.org please, in this case it is ok since game-data-packager
itself is 100% FOSS and the nonfree deps are the problem, but pkgs containing
any nonfree files should NOT be submitted to koji.fedoraproject.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:49 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-29 14:49:21 CET
---
Oh, my bad, I see that you did move to "make install", there just is quite a
bit of manual fixup to do afterwards.
The current:
https://github.com/a-detiste/game-data-packager/blob/master/tools/game-da...
Looks good, I will try to do a full review of the pkg soon.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:04 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-30
07:04:57 CET ---
I moved the manpage installation in the upstream shared 'make install' rule.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:41 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-30 19:41:25 CET
---
(In reply to comment #10)
I moved the manpage installation in the upstream shared 'make
install' rule.
Good, can you please provide a srpm with the latest state of things for review?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:39 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-31
11:39:03 CET ---
I now enabled the tests too.
Here's a new SRPM:
https://github.com/a-detiste/fedora/raw/master/game-data-packager-44-0.2....
Be careful with submitting scratch builds of rpmfusion pkgs to
koji.fedoraproject.org
Ok, I just wanted to build it once in a clean chroot.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:41 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-31
11:41:38 CET ---
Whoops wrong file:
https://github.com/a-detiste/fedora/blob/763b90e0e05a0f1a07da5829579b57ac...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:32 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #14 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2016-01-02 12:32:19 CET
---
Good:
=====
- rpmlint checks return:
game-data-packager.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
game-data-packager-20151231.tar.gz
This is normal for a snapshot pkg, ignore
game-data-packager.noarch: E: zero-length
/etc/game-data-packager/quake3-mirrors
I assume this is intentional and thus can also be ignored ?
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPLv2 and GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
Everything looks good to me: Approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:50 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #15 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2016-01-02
14:50:19 CET ---
(In reply to comment #14)
/etc/game-data-packager/quake3-mirrors
I assume this is intentional and thus can also be ignored ?
That was pre-emptively explained in #0.
(hey, I'm not angry or something ;-) )
I reviewed the git log for this file
and the various mirrors listed there
were taken offline one-by-one :-( ,
but the needed file are still available
on other mirrors. :-)
So that's an "upstream" problem, but I won't edit this
file there just to make rpmlint stop complaining.
I added this to the specfile; but this is not a change
big enough to warrant a new SRPM review:
"find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/game-data-packager -empty
-exec sh -c "echo '# we need more mirrors' > {}" \;"
--
Even more chatter ;-) :
I own two almost-20-years old ISP webpage accounts,
but those are so tiny like 15Mb that I can only
mirror the smallest files.
Or I could mirror some on my Raspeberry Pi "server"
as a last-resort mirror. (I have 100Gb/month)
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787990
There's a mirroring tool in tools/, that
can also check existing files against known hashes.
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/tool...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:37 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #16 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2016-01-03
11:37:35 CET ---
Package CVS request
======================
Package Name: game-data-packager
Short Description: Installer for game data files
Owners: adetiste
Branches: F-23
InitialCC:
----------------------
License tag: free
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:06 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |33
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:14 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|33 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:24 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sergio(a)serjux.com
--- Comment #17 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-07-22 23:24:16 CEST ---
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/game-data-packager/
Alexandre Detiste, now you may commit and build the package on RPMFusion ,
just need follow http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors instructions.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:39 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #18 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2016-07-23
00:39:09 CEST ---
Ok, I went a bit further, but:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12753
rfpkg build failed with
"ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:46 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #19 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-07-23 00:46:14 CEST ---
you need update rfpkg to 1.23.4 , should be already in repos !?!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #20 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2016-07-23
00:55:21 CEST ---
$ rpm -q rfpkg
rfpkg-1.23.3-1.fc25.noarch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:59 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #21 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-07-23 00:59:48 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #20)
$ rpm -q rfpkg
rfpkg-1.23.3-1.fc25.noarch
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=852
rfpkg-1.23.4-1.fc25 kwizart 2016-07-04 20:02:13
you need update to it
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:05 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #22 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2016-07-23
01:05:11 CEST ---
$ LANG=C dnf list rfpkg
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing',
disabling.
Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:46 ago on Sat Jul 23 00:56:31 2016.
Installed Packages
rfpkg.noarch 1.23.3-1.fc25 @rpmfusion-free-rawhide
Available Packages
rfpkg.noarch 1.23.4-1.fc25 rpmfusion-free-rawhide
??? I don't know what the '@' means.
$ sudo dnf install
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything...
-> This works.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:12 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #23 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-07-23 01:12:26 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #22)
$ LANG=C dnf list rfpkg
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing',
disabling.
Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:46 ago on Sat Jul 23 00:56:31 2016.
Installed Packages
rfpkg.noarch 1.23.3-1.fc25 @rpmfusion-free-rawhide
Available Packages
rfpkg.noarch 1.23.4-1.fc25 rpmfusion-free-rawhide
??? I don't know what the '@' means.
menas that is installed ?!? , so why not dnf update ?
$ sudo dnf install
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything...
-> This works.
DEBUG util.py:421: Error: Package: inkscape-0.92-0.fc25pre1.i686 (build)
DEBUG util.py:421: Requires: libpoppler.so.60
It is building correctly, but rawhide have many broken deps ..., you may
processed, if you want, to f24 .
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:47 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
--- Comment #24 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2016-07-23
01:47:17 CEST ---
Arrgh, I missed the "%{?dist}" thingie.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:08 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3863] Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863
Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #25 from Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com> 2016-07-23
10:08:11 CEST ---
I brutaly disabled .svg support in Rawhide package for now.
These .svg are checked again at runtime
& this application can cope with it.
The packages for F23 & F24 do have .svg support.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1334
days inactive
3074
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
29 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
RPM Fusion Bugzilla