I've packaged rpmfusion-package-config-smart, the review is here: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 The Source0 is basically the same as the tarball I posted yesterday except that it uses 4 template files and generates the i386/x86_64/ppc channels at build time using sed.

On Saturday, 03 November 2007 at 16:17, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 03.11.2007 16:07, Stewart Adam wrote: >> I've packaged rpmfusion-package-config-smart, the review is here: >> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 >> The Source0 is basically the same as the tarball I posted yesterday >> except that it uses 4 template files and generates the i386/x86_64/ppc >> channels at build time using sed. > Well, I've never used smart, but I think we should avoid a separate > package the best we can, as something like > You want to use rpmfusion? Then install package "foo" if you use smart, > or package "bar" is you use yum. > as that just totally confusing. IMHO smart channel configs should just go into rpmfusion-release.

On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 17:12 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 03.11.2007 17:06, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > IMHO smart channel configs should just go into rpmfusion-release. > > In case it wasn't obvious: that was of course what I meant. ;-) > > Cu > knurd In this case though rpmfusion-release must require Smart, which isn't great.

On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 22:01 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > No, it doesn't have to require smart. It may just drop the files > in the proper directory. > > R. Wouldn't that result in a leftover folder if they don't install smart though? Nothing major, but just saying.