Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 16:48, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers <rpmfusion-developers(a)lists.rpmfusion.org&gt; a écrit : While I don't disagree this should be the name of the package in the first step , can you clarify why this package rename would be needed now ? I tend to think that given it lesser usage, going with the current name would fit. Thanks.