http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106 NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |107 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-rpmfusion(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik- | |rpmfusion(a)vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-rpmfusion(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; 2008-10-30 18:53:42 --- It looks like this beta is the first nVidia driver which supports OpenGL 3.0 : http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=121763 I agree it's a strange version numbering.. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106 Stewart Adam <s.adam(a)diffingo.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Stewart Adam <s.adam(a)diffingo.com&gt; 2008-11-06 16:21:26 --- - source files match upstream --> We create our own tarballs, OK + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. - package builds properly. --> Doesn't work with 2.6.27, but 2.6.26 seems to work fine. A quick google didn't return any patches, but I'm sure one will turn up soon on nvnews (not a big deal - this is a beta driver after all. If the user wishes to use the beta driver, they can continue using the 2.6.26 kernel until nVidia releases a newer version). + package installs properly. + debuginfo package looks complete. - rpmlint is silent. --> Warnings are OK to ignore + final provides and requires are sane: + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106 NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #5 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2008-11-14 02:30:02 --- imported -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.