[Bug 4363] New: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs
4:02 a.m.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Bug ID: 4363
Summary: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld -
Chromium media libraries built with all possible
codecs
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: alexjnewt(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
Description:
Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs. Chromium is an
open-source web browser, powered by WebKit (Blink). This package replaces
the default chromium-libs-media package, which is limited in what it
can include.
RPMlint output:
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codecs ->
codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
codecs -> codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:227: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/libc.so
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:879: W: macro-in-comment %{target}
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:90: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces:
line 90, tab: line 60)
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: invalid-url Source2:
depot_tools.git-master.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
None of this really matters too much. As for the hardcoded-library-path error,
please read the note in the spec for more details. The
mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs is trivial and will be fixed in the next revision.
This package is mostly based off of the chromium package but has been trimmed
down to only really include the two codec libraries that Fedora will not
provide for legal reasons. I'm sure I'm probably building too much and things
can be trimmed down.
Note that this package takes forever to compile, but as I said, the spec likely
needs to be cleaned up, but feedback is welcome for sure. This will likely go
into rpmfusion free, but I'll be honest, I need to look into the source a bit
more as there maybe some nonfree bits.
I'll continue to work on it, I just wanted to upload something that built, so I
can get feedback.
One issue that should be addressed though; chromium depends on
chromium-libs-media, which this package provides as an alternative to the
trimmed down fedora version. I would think if chromium updates without this
packaging being updated, this package would be removed by the updater, while if
this package updates before chromium, it would cause broken dependencies.
EItherway, having rpmfusion's packages out of sync with Fedora's would no so
nice.
Perhaps a "chromium-freeworld" package would be better? The maintainer for
chromium has made it painfully easy to package a freeworld version, so this
wouldn't be too bad. I'll run a build of a chromium-freeworld package overnight
for testing, as I'm sort of leaning towards this being a better option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:41 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)gmail.com> ---
I spoke with Spot (Tom Callaway), the maintainer of chromium in Fedora, and the
issue with chromium-libs-media will be fixed with the next version of Chromium,
as chromium-libs will only require the major version to be more than equal. As
long as this is promptly updated every major version, no issues should exist.
As for this spec file, I'll work on sliming it down so only the necessary parts
are compiled.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:10 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)gmail.com> ---
Updated to latest rawhide version, also slimmed down the build so it will now
build in less than an hour (20 min or so on my machine using mock).
SPEC URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
Note that it still builds more than necessary, but I'm not sure how to slim it
down more; feedback welcome. Also, a fix from chromium's package in fedora is
still needed to resolve the chromium-libs-media issue.
Also the mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs warning is a false positive.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11:49 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
@jeremy
Any updates on this package ?
I indeed think this would be more appropriate to have the chromium-freeworld
package because:
- it's simpler
- it's assume we try to complement chromium as a whole, not only certain
feature subset of chromium libraries.
- if chromium needs another set of feature to complement, such as crypto algo,
then we would need to complement in the same chromium-freeworld package I would
expect.
BTW, is there any package linking to chromium-libs-media ? I don't get the
point to have a separate -media sub-package in fedora in the first step.
Thx for your work on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:49 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mhroncok(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
I have chromium-55.0.2883.87-1.fc25.x86_64 and I've noticed 2 things:
[~]$ rpm -q --requires chromium-libs | grep media
chromium-libs-media(x86-64) >= 55
That's good. But:
[~]$ rpm -q --requires chromium | grep media
chromium-libs-media(x86-64) = 55.0.2883.87-1.fc25
I think we need ">= 55" in both of those don't we?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2:40 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
Having a more deep look into your packages, it's seems like you are replacing
the media sub-package to complement the fedora chromium version.
So it's by design that you "substitute" the fedora -media version with a
freeworld version.
Unfortunately, the substitute methods imply to conflict with the fedora -media
package having them removed before the freeworld version can be installed.
If that's easy enough in command line, it will be more difficult to do with any
software center application.
So I'm trying to reword my question:
- Is there any reason the fedora chromium -media subpackage is shipped for
anything useful ? Is it possible to exclude
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/libffmpeg.so from chromium-libs-media , make
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/libmedia.so dlopen libffmpeg.so if available from
our -freeworld package ?
Or even better, make the libffmpeg.so dlopen ffmpeg-libs if available making
any chromium-*freeworld package unneeded ? (like what is done with firefox
currently dlopening ffmpeg-libs at runtime).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:23 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rdieter(a)math.unl.edu
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> ---
My understanding is: No that is not possible. What is proposed in the
original packaging here is (currently) the only/best way.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:48 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #5)
Having a more deep look into your packages, it's seems like you
are
replacing the media sub-package to complement the fedora chromium version.
So it's by design that you "substitute" the fedora -media version with a
freeworld version.
Unfortunately, the substitute methods imply to conflict with the fedora
-media package having them removed before the freeworld version can be
installed.
If that's easy enough in command line, it will be more difficult to do with
any software center application.
So I'm trying to reword my question:
- Is there any reason the fedora chromium -media subpackage is shipped for
anything useful ? Is it possible to exclude
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/libffmpeg.so from chromium-libs-media , make
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/libmedia.so dlopen libffmpeg.so if available
from our -freeworld package ?
Or even better, make the libffmpeg.so dlopen ffmpeg-libs if available making
any chromium-*freeworld package unneeded ? (like what is done with firefox
currently dlopening ffmpeg-libs at runtime).
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #6)
My understanding is: No that is not possible. What is proposed in
the
original packaging here is (currently) the only/best way.
Indeed, from what I can see, there are only two options:
- Add a chromium-freeworld package, which could be made conflict-free by
removing chrome-remote-desktop and reworking the fedora spec a bit.
- The current method of having a libs-media-freeworld package that replaces and
provides libs-media.
I don't believe that there's any other way of handling it.
I was going to spend some time today to update it, but if this is a blocking
issue, I can hold off until we can sort it out.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8:10 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #7)
...
I was going to spend some time today to update it, but if this is a
blocking
issue, I can hold off until we can sort it out.
It's not a blocking issue,
please don't hold on on this.
But as rdieter said, it's the current best way. It doesn't mean there isn't a
path to improve later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #9 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #8)
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #7)
...
> I was going to spend some time today to update it, but if this is a blocking
> issue, I can hold off until we can sort it out.
It's not a blocking issue, please don't hold on on this.
But as rdieter said, it's the current best way. It doesn't mean there isn't
a path to improve later.
Sounds good. I'll update it as soon as I can.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:52 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #10 from paviluf(a)yahoo.fr ---
Any progress ? Thanks !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:07 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #11 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)gmail.com> ---
Sorry, I've been sick for a while and had a recent death of a loved one, so
I've been a bit distracted lately. If anyone would like to take this off of me,
feel free, but if not, I will update this once I recover. Sorry for the delay.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11:13 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcallawa(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
Look at what I found:
https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-libs-media-freeworld.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3:51 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #12)
Look at what I found:
https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-libs-media-freeworld.spec
Oh, that "No One" person from the %changelog. Please remind me to thank him and
buy him a beer next time I see him ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:10 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #14 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #12)
Look at what I found:
https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-libs-media-freeworld.spec
Thanks Tom!
Unfortunately I don't think I have time to maintain this package anymore. If
anyone would like to take it, feel free. I can also give some time to review
this if needed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:54 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
MeSat(a)TelusPlanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |MeSat(a)TelusPlanet.net
--- Comment #15 from MeSat(a)TelusPlanet.net ---
Jeremy, sorry for your loss.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:55 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #16 from MeSat(a)TelusPlanet.net ---
I hope someone takes this over. Thank you.
If this gets sorted out, then "discord" can be resolved as well.
Bug 4441
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:39 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #17 from paviluf(a)yahoo.fr ---
I hope someone takes this over. It's a fairly important package to really enjoy
using chromium.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:45 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Vasiliy Glazov <vascom2(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vascom2(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #18 from Vasiliy Glazov <vascom2(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to paviluf from comment #17)
I hope someone takes this over. It's a fairly important package
to really
enjoy using chromium.
Thank you.
You can take chromium from russianfedora repo. It has all codecs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:47 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #19 from paviluf(a)yahoo.fr ---
I know, thanks :)
It don't need that much to have it in rpm fusion too !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2:35 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
Huh, how odd. Someone updated that spec file to 58.
https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-libs-media-freeworld.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:51 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #21 from Mike Goodwin <mike(a)mgoodwin.net> ---
Created attachment 1780
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1780&action=edit
youtube test
Took me way longer than I want to admit to realize that I could just download
the chromium SRPM and copy the spec into the extracted folder in order to
easily acquire all the patches.
It works great, and passed the "youtube test" https://www.youtube.com/html5
with flying colors!
Dependencies resolved.
========================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version
Repository Size
========================================================================================================================================
Installing:
chromium-libs-media-freeworld x86_64
58.0.3029.110-2.fc25 @commandline 2.2 M
replacing chromium-libs-media.x86_64 58.0.3029.110-2.fc25
Transaction Summary
========================================================================================================================================
Install 1 Package
Total size: 2.2 M
Installed size: 7.1 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
Installing : chromium-libs-media-freeworld-58.0.3029.110-2.fc25.x86_64
1/2
Obsoleting : chromium-libs-media-58.0.3029.110-2.fc25.x86_64
2/2
Verifying : chromium-libs-media-freeworld-58.0.3029.110-2.fc25.x86_64
1/2
Verifying : chromium-libs-media-58.0.3029.110-2.fc25.x86_64
2/2
Installed:
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.x86_64 58.0.3029.110-2.fc25
Complete!
It overrid the chromium-libs-media package as it was supposed to and worked out
of the box after that. Well done mystery SPEC updater. Definitely promising
results.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8:15 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #22 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Mike Goodwin from comment #21)
Created attachment 1780 [details]
youtube test
Took me way longer than I want to admit to realize that I could just
download the chromium SRPM and copy the spec into the extracted folder in
order to easily acquire all the patches.
It works great, and passed the "youtube test" https://www.youtube.com/html5
with flying colors!
Would you volunteer to maintain it in RPM Fusion ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9:52 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #23 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Koji scratch build for F26:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=131817
If it can get a review exception, I'm willing to maintain this package in
rpmfusion (and i will hope that Nobody will keep the spec updated).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9:56 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |kwizart(a)gmail.com
|mfusion.org |
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #24 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #23)
Koji scratch build for F26:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=131817
Sure, go ahead!
Thx
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dominik(a)greysector.net
--- Comment #25 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>
---
Great, thanks for taking care of this. Just one minor nitpick: it'd be nice to
have as many bundled libraries as possible mentioned in Provides: bundled(foo)
= version format, as is required by the packaging guidelines.
Maybe one day we can have this built against system ffmpeg...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:43 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #26 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Still awaiting review in
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/packager/churchyard/requests
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #25)
Great, thanks for taking care of this. Just one minor nitpick:
it'd be nice
to have as many bundled libraries as possible mentioned in Provides:
bundled(foo) = version format, as is required by the packaging guidelines.
Maybe one day we can have this built against system ffmpeg...
Could you please help with obtaining such list?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:26 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #27 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
59.
https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-libs-media-freeworld.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:04 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #28 from paviluf(a)yahoo.fr ---
Thank you very much !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #29 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
The builds are blue for quite some time.
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/tasks?owner=churchyard&state=all
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:38 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #30 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Built. http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=499
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:08 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #31 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
I have few problems with this spec file.This kind of miss my attention.
This package violate our founding principle
https://rpmfusion.org/FoundingPrinciples.
Quoting: "Both repositories (free/nonfree) contain only add-on packages and not
replacements in relation to the base package set. Whereby the base package set
is defined as: RHEL/CentOS + EPEL or Fedora (Fedora 7+) "
I'm about to remove theses from our repo without delay (on the next push).
I'm suggesting to rework the packaging in a way that avoid replacing base
"package". Please not that our principles doesn't forbid to replace any
library.
Here is my suggestion:
- have chromium and chromium-freeworld
- have fedora chromium install a symlink libffmpeg.so.fedora to libffmpeg.so
(same for libmedia.so). using %version.0 as priority with update-alternatives
- have rpmfusion chromium-freeworld install a libmedia.so.freeworld with
%{version}.9 as a priority with update-alternatives.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:26 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #32 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
Also another problem is the dependency check for chromium and the freeworld
counterpart. I would suggest to completely drop that with the -libs-media
fedora sub-package.
Instead, have this in the freeworld counterpart:
- Requires: chromium%{_isa} >= %{version}
- Conflicts: chromium%{_isa} >= %{version}-99999
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:30 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #33 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #32)
A bonus question is how this should be handled with appdata...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:37 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #34 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
I'm happy to make any changes to Fedora's chromium package to accomodate this,
but I would appreciate them in patch format.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:56 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #35 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>
---
Created attachment 1812
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1812&action=edit
patch to ship libmedia.so, libffmpeg.so and libwidevinecdm.so with alternatives
support
Would something like this patch be acceptable? koji scratch build in progress
here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20263514 .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #36 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
The alternatives routines look sane to me. Untested though.
You'd need to apply the same logic to the rpmfusion addon, obviously.
My brain keeps trying to figure out a clean way to have one spec spit out both
packages (triggered by the %freeworld conditional), but when I try to do it, it
gets messy, so I'm thinking thats a bad plan.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:51 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #37 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>
---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #36)
The alternatives routines look sane to me. Untested though.
You'd need to apply the same logic to the rpmfusion addon, obviously.
My brain keeps trying to figure out a clean way to have one spec spit out
both packages (triggered by the %freeworld conditional), but when I try to
do it, it gets messy, so I'm thinking thats a bad plan.
That should be possible. You can simply conditionalize (on %if 0%{freeworld})
all %files sections and put %files media-libs-freeworld in %else.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:21 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #38 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #35)
Created attachment 1812 [details]
patch to ship libmedia.so, libffmpeg.so and libwidevinecdm.so with
alternatives support
Would something like this patch be acceptable? koji scratch build in
progress here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20263514 .
This looks to be in the right way. Thx for handling this.
Few comments,
- You are probably missing to remove the Obsoletes/Replace
- If libwidevinecdm.so doesn't need to be replaced by a freeworld version,
maybe you can avoid to rename it ?
- Using 0%{?freeworld} seems more robust than %{freeworld} in case the define
is unset (it should be set to 0 by default, but it cannot be unset).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #39 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>
---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #38)
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment
#35)
> Created attachment 1812 [details]
> patch to ship libmedia.so, libffmpeg.so and libwidevinecdm.so with
> alternatives support
>
> Would something like this patch be acceptable? koji scratch build in
> progress here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20263514 .
This looks to be in the right way. Thx for handling this.
Few comments,
- You are probably missing to remove the Obsoletes/Replace
Probably. ;)
- If libwidevinecdm.so doesn't need to be replaced by a freeworld
version,
maybe you can avoid to rename it ?
True, but this allows replacing it by users without affecting the packaged
files.
I have a locally built widevine RPM that uses alternatives, but obviously isn't
redistributable.
- Using 0%{?freeworld} seems more robust than %{freeworld} in case
the
define is unset (it should be set to 0 by default, but it cannot be unset).
Ok.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:10 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #40 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
I'll be gone for a while, so if Dominik or anyone else want's ACLs for
chromium-libs-media-freeworld, please request soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:21 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #41 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
FYI I've untagged the -freeworld packages given the lack on update on this
topic.
It would be fine for the fedora chromium package to properly obsoletes the
previous -freeworld package.
Trying to learn from this failure. I don't think have a "complementary
freeworld package" is the way forward. This is going to be crazy to maintain
for not much benefit as a complement.
Instead doing a "full built" of a chromium(-freeworld) package would allows
both packages to possibly be de-synchronized for few time if the packages
aren't push in the same exact time.
This would dramatically reduce the "pressure" on the rpmfusion packager and on
the rpmfusion infra to "follow" the fedora chromium packager.
Any remark on that ?
The other point is that I'm trying to figure out of a way to build rpmfusion
package from fedora "unmodified" distgit (or few modifications).
Basically the process would be:
cd fedora:
fedpkg new-sources chromium*clean.tar.xz
...
fedpkg commit -p -a "Update chromium snapshot"
cd ../free
rfpkg new-source chromium*original.tar.xz
rfpkg push
rfpkg build
rfpkg-minimal would call fedpkg-minimal except for the sources.
(eventually using rpmdev-bumpspec -r -c "Automatic rebuilt" from an anonymous
account...)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:48 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #42 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #41)
FYI I've untagged the -freeworld packages given the lack on
update on this
topic.
That seems premature. In 59.0.3071.115-2, I committed Rathann's patch to enable
alternatives and conditionalized the spec such that if the %freeworld variable
is flipped to 1, it will build the matching chromium-libs-media-freeworld
addon.
This should make it extremely easy for rpmfusion to do complementary upgrades,
possibly even automated ones.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:07 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #43 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #42)
...
This should make it extremely easy for rpmfusion to do complementary
upgrades, possibly even automated ones.
Both of theses options nevertheless needs
resources to do the needed work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:21 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #44 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Updating the package to match latest changes in Fedora.
If all necessary work will be to flip the flag, I will try to automate it for
the next release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:36 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #45 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
Miro, please see the changes I committed in -3 to fix upgrading. You need to
make the same change on this end (again, should be as easy as taking the spec
from git and flipping the freeworld value to 1).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:39 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #46 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
The builds are failing:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151088
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151158
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151369
Nevertheless there's one more thing: Even if the freeworld value is flipped to
1, the Name of the (source) package remains chromium, which might be
problematic. Would you accept a change that would do:
%if %{freeworld}
Name: chromium%{chromium_channel}-libs-media-freeworld
%else
Name: chromium%{chromium_channel}
%endif
And:
%if %{freeworld}
%files
%else
%files libs-media
%endif
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:25 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #47 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #46)
The builds are failing:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151088
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151158
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151369
Missing -lavcodec or else
somewhere.
Nevertheless there's one more thing: Even if the freeworld value
is flipped
to 1, the Name of the (source) package remains chromium, which might be
problematic. Would you accept a change that would do:
%if %{freeworld}
Name: chromium%{chromium_channel}-libs-media-freeworld
%else
Name: chromium%{chromium_channel}
%endif
I would simplify with
chromium%{chromium_channel}%{?freeworld:-%{freeworld}}
And:
%if %{freeworld}
%files
%else
%files libs-media
%endif
Then there is no point to drop a chromium-*-libs-media sub-package anymore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:07 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #48 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #47)
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #46)
> The builds are failing:
>
> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151088
> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151158
> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151369
Missing -lavcodec or else somewhere.
Will look.
> Nevertheless there's one more thing: Even if the freeworld
value is flipped
> to 1, the Name of the (source) package remains chromium, which might be
> problematic. Would you accept a change that would do:
>
>
> %if %{freeworld}
> Name: chromium%{chromium_channel}-libs-media-freeworld
> %else
> Name: chromium%{chromium_channel}
> %endif
I would simplify with chromium%{chromium_channel}%{?freeworld:-%{freeworld}}
That would do, I guess.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:26 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #49 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #48)
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #47)
> (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #46)
> > The builds are failing:
> >
> > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151088
> > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151158
> > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151369
> Missing -lavcodec or else somewhere.
Will look.
Not sure if
obj/third_party/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_internal/aacsbr.o:(.rodata.ff_sbr_noise_table+0x0):
multiple definition of `ff_sbr_noise_table'
obj/third_party/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_internal/autorename_libavcodec_sbrdsp.o:(.rodata.ff_sbr_noise_table+0x0):
first defined here
can be done by missing -l flag.
> > Nevertheless there's one more thing: Even if the
freeworld value is flipped
> > to 1, the Name of the (source) package remains chromium, which might be
> > problematic. Would you accept a change that would do:
> >
> >
> > %if %{freeworld}
> > Name: chromium%{chromium_channel}-libs-media-freeworld
> > %else
> > Name: chromium%{chromium_channel}
> > %endif
> I would simplify with chromium%{chromium_channel}%{?freeworld:-%{freeworld}}
That would do, I guess.
Actually chromium%{chromium_channel}%{?freeworld:-freeworld}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:38 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #50 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
The %files change is invalid for the reason that Nicolas points out, but I'll
apply the naming one in the 60 build I'm working on now. I'll also test build
the freeworld package for sanity, but I need to get the actual chromium package
building cleanly first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:37 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #51 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Thanks spot.
Once we figure it out, we can rename the main package in rpmfuison to
chromium-freeworld for sure.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:38 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
stan <cuex_groppud0(a)q.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cuex_groppud0(a)q.com
--- Comment #52 from stan <cuex_groppud0(a)q.com> ---
chromium is not updating to the latest version when I run a dnf update on my
Fedora 25 system. It seems to be related to the chromium-libs package being
discussed in this ticket.
It wants to update to
chromium-libs x86_64
59.0.3071.115-2.fc25
updates-testing
but I have
chromium-libs-59.0.3071.104-1.fc25.x86_64
chromium-libs-media-freeworld-59.0.3071.104-1.fc25.x86_64
installed, and so it can't. I think it is because there is no update for the
freeworld package.
Will this resolve automatically when this ticket gets sorted out? Or is it a
different issue that I should open a ticket for?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:46 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #53 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to stan from comment #52)
Will this resolve automatically when this ticket gets sorted out? Or
is it
a different issue that I should open a ticket for?
It will. In the meantime, if you want up to date chromium but without freeworld
media libs, you should be able to `dnf uninstall chromium*` and then `dnf
install chromoium chromium-libs-media`.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:35 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #54 from stan <cuex_groppud0(a)q.com> ---
Yes, that worked. When I removed chromium, it removed the .104
chromium-libs-media-freeworld package.
And when I re-installed chromium, it pulled in the new .115 chromium-libs-media
package.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:52 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #55 from stan <cuex_groppud0(a)q.com> ---
I spoke too soon. When I tried to run dnf update, it wanted to replace the
.115 version of the chromium-libs-media with the .104 version
chromium-libs-media-freeworld, and remove the .115 version of chromium. I
think it might be because the epoch on the chromium-libs-media-freeworld is 1.
But that's a downgrade, so it shouldn't be what is wanted. Does the
chromium-libs-media-freeworld package need to be updated to version .115 so it
is compatible with chromium version .115?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:36 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #56 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Yes the versions need to match. Hopefully we'll resolve this soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:32 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #57 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Rawhide scratch built http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=153386
I believe we should retire chromium-libs-media-freeworld and create
chromium-freeworld instead. Later if the 60.0.3112.90-1 version goes to Fedora
25 and 26, I can built those as well.
Notes for automation:
* git merges stuff from Fedora quite well now when the only difference in the
spec file is one line and the filename
* the only thing that conflicts is sources and .gitignore but that can be
merged with -strategy-option=ours. And later amended with additional logic that
gets the policy_templates.zip and depot_tools.git-master.tar.gz from Fedora
lookaside cache and rpmdev-spectool -g the chromium sources.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:30 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #58 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
FWIW, 60.0.3112.90-1 is building now. I fixed it up so that it works properly
to build with %freeworld set to 1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:42 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #59 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Scratchbuilding on F26 and F25 as well.
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=153444
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=153446
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:46 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #60 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
chromium-libs-media-freeworld-60.0.3112.90-1.fc26.x86_64 from the cratch build
and chromium-60.0.3112.90-1.fc26.x86_64 from Fedora Koji work together.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:17 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #61 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #60)
chromium-libs-media-freeworld-60.0.3112.90-1.fc26.x86_64 from the
cratch
build and chromium-60.0.3112.90-1.fc26.x86_64 from Fedora Koji work together.
Can you please submit non-scratch build no "at least" repos are not broken
anymore !?!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:38 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #62 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
I can try, however I'm not sure it will be taken if the Name differs. I thought
it will not work (but to be fair, I haven't tried).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:41 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #63 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
BuildError: package chromium-freeworld not in list for tag f27-free
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:42 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #64 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Should I submit chromium-freeworld for package review, or can we do an
exception and create it directly?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:27 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kevin.kofler(a)chello.at
--- Comment #65 from Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #25)
Maybe one day we can have this built against system ffmpeg...
This should be possible, but you also have to use the system libvpx and
libwebp. (The current Chromium packaging uses the bundled libvpx.) I have this
working in qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld, but QtWebEngine is always based on older
Chromium branches (with security fixes backported), so the pressure to have the
latest and greatest libraries is a bit lower than for Chromium.
I can tell you that Chromium 56 builds fine against the libvpx 1.6.1 in F25 (it
needs ≥ 1.6.0) and against the FFmpeg in F25, but that information will not
help you much because you are already at Chromium 60.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:31 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #66 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #64)
Should I submit chromium-freeworld for package review, or can we do
an
exception and create it directly?
You need to create another review for the package creation process to be
checked (same as fedora).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:53 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 4363] Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium
media libraries built with all possible codecs
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #67 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 4628 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1969
days inactive
2701
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
68 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
RPM Fusion Bugzilla