https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4348 MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mgansser(a)alice.de Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |mgansser(a)alice.de |mfusion.org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4348 --- Comment #2 from Vasiliy Glazov <vascom2(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Why I should use last git commit if gnome-mpv has releases? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4348 --- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov <vascom2(a)gmail.com&gt; --- URL to release also valid and I not see problem here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4348 --- Comment #6 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de&gt; --- (In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #4) ok accepted, i will make the review now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4348 MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |4 --- Comment #8 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de&gt; --- APPROVED Please fix Licence tag when you import (add "MIT/X11 (BSD like)") Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: These BR are not needed: gcc See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 ==> could be ignored, not a issue ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "GPL (v3 or later) GPL (v3 or later)", "FSF All Permissive", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 50 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/martin/rpmbuild/SPECS/gnome-mpv/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: glib-compile-schemas is run in %postun and %posttrans if package has *.gschema.xml files. Note: gschema file(s) in gnome-mpv [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [-]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry. Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in gnome-mpv [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in gnome-mpv [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in gnome- mpv-debuginfo [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: gnome-mpv-0.10-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm gnome-mpv-debuginfo-0.10-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm gnome-mpv-0.10-1.fc26.src.rpm gnome-mpv.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) frontend -> fronted, front end, front-end gnome-mpv.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmpv -> limp gnome-mpv.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gnome-mpv gnome-mpv.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) frontend -> fronted, front end, front-end gnome-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmpv -> limp 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: gnome-mpv-debuginfo-0.10-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- gnome-mpv.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) frontend -> fronted, front end, front-end gnome-mpv.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmpv -> limp gnome-mpv.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gnome-mpv 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Requires -------- gnome-mpv (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh hicolor-icon-theme libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo-gobject.so.2()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libepoxy.so.0()(64bit) libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit) libmpv.so.1()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) youtube-dl gnome-mpv-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- gnome-mpv: appdata() appdata(io.github.GnomeMpv.appdata.xml) application() application(io.github.GnomeMpv.desktop) gnome-mpv gnome-mpv(x86-64) mimehandler(application/ogg) mimehandler(application/sdp) mimehandler(application/smil) mimehandler(application/streamingmedia) mimehandler(application/vnd.rn-realmedia) mimehandler(application/vnd.rn-realmedia-vbr) mimehandler(application/x-ogg) mimehandler(application/x-smil) mimehandler(application/x-streamingmedia) mimehandler(audio/AMR) mimehandler(audio/aac) mimehandler(audio/ac3) mimehandler(audio/flac) mimehandler(audio/m4a) mimehandler(audio/mp1) mimehandler(audio/mp2) mimehandler(audio/mp3) mimehandler(audio/mp4) mimehandler(audio/mpeg) mimehandler(audio/mpegurl) mimehandler(audio/mpg) mimehandler(audio/ogg) mimehandler(audio/rn-mpeg) mimehandler(audio/scpls) mimehandler(audio/vnd.rn-realaudio) mimehandler(audio/wav) mimehandler(audio/x-aac) mimehandler(audio/x-ape) mimehandler(audio/x-flac) mimehandler(audio/x-m4a) mimehandler(audio/x-mp1) mimehandler(audio/x-mp2) mimehandler(audio/x-mp3) mimehandler(audio/x-mpeg) mimehandler(audio/x-mpegurl) mimehandler(audio/x-mpg) mimehandler(audio/x-ms-wma) mimehandler(audio/x-pls) mimehandler(audio/x-pn-realaudio) mimehandler(audio/x-pn-windows-pcm) mimehandler(audio/x-realaudio) mimehandler(audio/x-scpls) mimehandler(audio/x-shorten) mimehandler(audio/x-tta) mimehandler(audio/x-vorbis+ogg) mimehandler(audio/x-wav) mimehandler(audio/x-wavpack) mimehandler(video/mp2t) mimehandler(video/mp4) mimehandler(video/mpeg) mimehandler(video/msvideo) mimehandler(video/ogg) mimehandler(video/quicktime) mimehandler(video/vnd.rn-realvideo) mimehandler(video/webm) mimehandler(video/x-avi) mimehandler(video/x-fli) mimehandler(video/x-flv) mimehandler(video/x-matroska) mimehandler(video/x-mpeg) mimehandler(video/x-mpeg2) mimehandler(video/x-ms-afs) mimehandler(video/x-ms-asf) mimehandler(video/x-ms-wmv) mimehandler(video/x-ms-wmx) mimehandler(video/x-ms-wvxvideo) mimehandler(video/x-msvideo) mimehandler(video/x-ogm+ogg) mimehandler(video/x-theora) gnome-mpv-debuginfo: gnome-mpv-debuginfo gnome-mpv-debuginfo(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/gnome-mpv/gnome-mpv/releases/download/v0.10/gnome-mpv-... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 92d967bbbbfabdfa3ab1f19be625f684959513890b2035ca6102292392fbf183 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 92d967bbbbfabdfa3ab1f19be625f684959513890b2035ca6102292392fbf183 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free -rn ../SRPMS/gnome-mpv-0.10-1.fc25.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4 [Bug 4] Tracker: Accepted packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4348 Vasiliy Glazov <vascom2(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33 [Bug 33] Tracker: Packages awaitting CVS Administration -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4348 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33 [Bug 33] Tracker: Packages awaitting CVS Administration -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.