http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1252
--- Comment #12 from Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com> 2010-11-11
17:38:28 ---
As promised, here is a new version:
SPEC URL:
http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/swftools/swftools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/swftools/swftools-0.9.1-2.fc14.src.rpm
Build logs:
http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/swftools/build.log
I added fftw-devel and zziplib-devel as BR, as suggested by Orion in comment
#8. I also re-enabled the build of Python modules. I mentionned too the other
licenses as asked by Orcan in comment #2.
About the prefix patch, it seems it was already suggested:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/swftools-common/2009-06/msg00079.html
With no effects...
About the license issue, I've just sent a message on the SWFTools mailing list:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/swftools-common/2010-11/msg00084.html
(In reply to comment #2)
? The package bundles a copy of xpdf which is available in Fedora. Is
it
possible to patch it out?
I see no way to link against xpdf, no API or such is
provided in the Fedora
package. The sources embed a copy of gocr too, with the same problem.
(In reply to comment #9)
If you allow me a suggestion, I think it would be extremely useful to
package
also swftools-unstable with the latest development snapshots. Some bugfixes or
new implementations are there until the new version is released.
Unless I directly
submit the devel version here, I don't think guidelines would
allow such a "double" packaging of swftools.
(In reply to comment #3)
Done.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.