2012/1/31 Jiri Hladky <hladky.jiri(a)googlemail.com>:
I'm not sure what license tag I should for a license which restricts free
usage for non-commercial usage only:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted without a fee for private, research, academic,
or other non-commercial purposes. Any use of this software by a commercial
enterprise requires a written licence from the copyright owner.
Currently I have used:
License: Custom (Non-Commercial Use Only)
Is this correct?
Are you using Custom in an attempt to silent rpmlint ?
Does that work ?
Because I don't see "much" interest in having the Custom word in the
Once that said that's suggest to read the package license to get a
complete idea of the rights and duties over the license.