http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi&gt; 2010-04-19 18:17:41 --- rpmlint output: rtmpdump.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmp -> ramp, romp, rump rtmpdump.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpt -> prompt, rampart, tempt rtmpdump.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpe -> romper, temper, tamper rtmpdump.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpte -> tempter, prompter, prompted rtmpdump.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmps -> ramps, romps, rumps rtmpdump.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmp -> ramp, romp, rump rtmpdump.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpt -> prompt, rampart, tempt rtmpdump.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpe -> romper, temper, tamper rtmpdump.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpte -> tempter, prompter, prompted rtmpdump.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmps -> ramps, romps, rumps 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. These are OK. *** Drop SOURCE1, it's functionally identical to the original makefile. *** MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. ~OK - Please change %{_mandir}/*/* to %{_mandir}/man1/rtmpdump.1.* %{_mandir}/man8/rtmpgw.8.* MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 --- Comment #3 from dwmw2(a)infradead.org 2010-04-19 21:18:32 --- (In reply to comment #2) Oops, sorry -- that was there to debug why 'make posix' wasn't working (because $MAKEFLAGS ends up with weird stuff in it), and I forgot to drop it. Um, OK -- but why? That was having the same effect anyway, surely? Updated files in same location. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi&gt; 2010-04-19 21:29:05 --- (In reply to comment #3) Yes, but a) the latter one is clearer, and b) it can't end up owning anything it isn't supposed to. For instance the latter might end up owning the i18n man directories (e.g. %{_mandir}/en/man{0p,1,1p,2,3,3p,4,5,6,7,8,9} along with their content). Still approved. But do bump the release (and make a corresponding entry in the changelog) whenever you make changes, since otherwise it is near impossible for other people to see what has happened. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|4 | Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi&gt; 2011-08-05 10:49:40 --- This seems to have been imported a long time ago. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.