[Bug 2632] New: Review request: amuleadunanza - File sharing client compatible with eDonkey - Adunanza MOD
3:33 p.m.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
Bug #: 2632
Summary: Review request: amuleadunanza - File sharing client
compatible with eDonkey - Adunanza MOD
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: lorenzo.dalrio(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec: http://lorenzodalrio.fedorapeople.org/amuleadunanza.spec
srpm: http://lorenzodalrio.fedorapeople.org/amuleadunanza-2012.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description: aMuleAdunanzA is the mod of aMule dedicated to Fastweb ISP users.
aMule is an easy to use multi-platform client for ED2K Peer-to-Peer
Network. It is a fork of xMule, which was based on eMule for
Windows. aMule currently supports (but is not limited to) the
following platforms: Linux, *BSD and MacOS X.
Why not in fedora: could be legal problems with p2p software.
rpmlint output:
Checking: amuleadunanza-2012.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
amuleadunanza-2012.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
amuleadunanza-debuginfo-2012.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
amuleadunanza-nogui-2012.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) eDonkey -> e Donkey, >donkey,
monkey
amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US aMule -> a Mule,
>mule, amulet
amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch,
>mufti
amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xMule -> x Mule,
>mule, mullet
amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whis -> which, >his,
whirs
amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eMule -> e Mule,
>mule, Lemuel
amuleadunanza.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/amulegui.1.gz >4:
warning: macro `"' not defined
This one is not clear to me, man page seems
to work fine.
amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) eDonkey -> e
Donkey, >donkey, monkey
amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US aMule -> a Mule, >mule,
amulet
amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, >mufti
amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xMule -> x Mule, >mule,
mullet
amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whis -> which, his,
>whirs
amuleadunanza.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eMule -> e Mule, >mule,
Lemuel
amuleadunanza-nogui.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
This one refers to systemd
unit used to start amuleadunanza daemon.
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.
Noticed in rpmfusion wishlist.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3:33 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2632] Review request: amuleadunanza - File sharing client compatible with eDonkey - Adunanza MOD
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
Lorenzo Dalrio <lorenzo.dalrio(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:06 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2632] Review request: amuleadunanza - File sharing client compatible with eDonkey - Adunanza MOD
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
Alec Leamas <leamas.alec(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |leamas.alec(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec(a)gmail.com> 2013-01-02 18:06:17 CET ---
hm... I actually don't really see why this shouldn't go to Fedora where other
p2p clients such as the bittorent suite lives; "could be legal problems with
p2p software" is certainly not motivation enough.
If there actually is a problem (which I doubt) the fastest track is most likely
to submit this to Fedora anyway, since we really need a statement from
fedora-legal before it's accepted here in rpmfusion IMHO.
I have done similar things myself: picking a package in rpmfusion's wishlist
and put in Fedora. So that shouldn't be the first time :)
Can I remind of the somewhat updated Fedora review process at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process without being rude?
--alec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:36 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2632] Review request: amuleadunanza - File sharing client compatible with eDonkey - Adunanza MOD
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
--- Comment #2 from Lorenzo Dalrio <lorenzo.dalrio(a)gmail.com> 2013-01-03 08:36:34
CET ---
(In reply to comment #1)
hm... I actually don't really see why this shouldn't go to
Fedora where other
p2p clients such as the bittorent suite lives; "could be legal problems with
p2p software" is certainly not motivation enough.
Hi Alec,
you are right, "could be legal problem" it's quite generic, to be honest i
have
just copied&pasted it from wishlist entry, sorry. :)
Since amuleadunanza it's an amule mod and amule it is distributed in rpmfusion
free repository, i thought that amuleadunanza could be shipped from here too.
If you think it is worth to submit it to fedora, i can do it. ;)
Lorenzo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9:06 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2632] Review request: amuleadunanza - File sharing client compatible with eDonkey - Adunanza MOD
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
--- Comment #3 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec(a)gmail.com> 2013-01-03 10:06:49 CET ---
Now,if I get this correct this package does not depend on amule, it actually
Conflict: it. So what what applies to amule does not apply to amuleadunanza.
Furthermore, there was a proposal to move amule to Fedora in bug 1253. The only
reason this wasn't done seems to be lack of resources.
So: I think the best is to submit it to Fedora to find out if it's rejected
there first. Personally,I think it belongs there from what I know now (which
honestly isn't that much).
Don't forget to add a link to the Fedora request in this bug!
BTW: Don't be sorry. Being sorry for everything I don't see or understand is a
bad start for new year :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:22 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2632] Review request: amuleadunanza - File sharing client compatible with eDonkey - Adunanza MOD
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
--- Comment #4 from Lorenzo Dalrio <lorenzo.dalrio(a)gmail.com> 2013-01-03 19:22:25
CET ---
(In reply to comment #3)
BTW: Don't be sorry. Being sorry for everything I don't see
or understand is a
bad start for new year :)
Thank you Alec! :)
I have submitted bug 891701 to fedora. [1]
If amuleadunanza will pass fedora review, i'll take care of amule too if still
interested in moving it from rpmfusion to fedora. ;)
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891701
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1254
days inactive
4126
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
7 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
RPM Fusion Bugzilla