Hi! The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed: avbin-7-8_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3187... avidemux-2_4_4-5_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3188... audacity-freeworld-1_3_6-0_3_beta_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3185... compat-python24-elementtree-1_2_6-7_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3197... compat-python24-2_4_5-5_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3196... compat-python24-feedparser-4_1-6_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3198... compat-plone-3_1_4-3_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3195... compat-python24-setuptools-0_6c7-5_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3202... em8300-kmod-0_17_2-2_fc11_14 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3213... dvdstyler-1_7_2-2_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3211... flvtool2-1_0_6-3_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3216... compat-zope-2_10_6-3_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3203... elisa-plugins-ugly-0_3_5-4_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3212... gcube-0_4-7_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3218... gambatte-0_4_1-2_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3217... k9copy-2_3_0-2_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3231... kmediafactory-0_7_0-0_3_rc2_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3233... ndiswrapper-kmod-1_54-2_fc11_18 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3271... fglrx-kmod-9_4-0_2_beta_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/3... compat-python24-2_4_5-5_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3196... lastfm-1_4_2_58240-5_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3239... libtunepimp-extras-freeworld-0_5_3-6_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3247... libmpeg2-0_5_1-6_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3246... mjpegtools-1_9_0-0_7_rc3_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3258... motion-3_2_11-4_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3261... mythtv-0_22-0_2_svn_r20273_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3267... streamdvd-0_4-9_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3296... streamripper-1_63_5-3_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3297... subtitleripper-0_3-7_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3298... vdr-dxr3-0_2_8-4_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3308... vdr-mp3-0_10_1-8_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3309... vdr-muggle-0_1_12-5_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3310... wormsofprey-0_4_3-4_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3315... vdrsync-0_1_3-13_PRE1_050322_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3311... vlc-0_9_9-0_4rc2_fc11_1 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3312... madwifi-kmod-0_9_4-61_r3861_20080903_fc11_19 http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/3... sidplay-2_0_9-6_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/3... snes9x-1_51-3_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/3... bsnes-0_041-2_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/3... libdlna-0_2_3-11_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3241... vice-2_1-2_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/3... comical-0_8-10_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/3... Some of them might be easy to fix, some of them can likely be ignored (madwifi for example is supposed to be dropped, but no dead.package file has been created yet, hence it got built). There might even be some false positives in above list if the maintainer submitted a fresh build already; there is also the chance that I missed a package or two. But I thought it might be better to post above list now instead of later today/over the next few days after I found time to check and clean up everything. Yes, maintainers are not listed, I had no easy and quick way to look them up in a scripted fashion. One question: Should I push those packages out or do we want to wait a bit until the Fedora beta settled (e.g. something like Thursday or Friday)? CU knurd

On 31.03.2009 08:16, Julian Sikorski wrote: > [...] /me wonders if I should requeue all the failed jobs once in case there were more hiccups (I suspect there are)

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:16:04 +0200, Julian wrote: > bsnes looks like a buildsystem hiccup. Could you please requeue? Indeed it looks much like the very old race-condition (which had been fixed in Fedora/EPEL Plague) under which successful build results are copied more than once and cause a job to fail.

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:14:20 +0200, Thorsten wrote: > In short: Our infra sucks. Well, "infra" consists of multiple things:

- the available hardware resources

[...]

- the organisational model that is being used (e.g. meetings, agenda, task offers, recruiting of volunteers, distribution of power'n'privileges) - the management model that is implemented (who decides what can be achieved, what will be done and who will do it? who verifies the goals are reached?)

With RPMFusion there are many open questions.

Probably some of them could be answered by visiting IRC,

but still it wouldn't be clear whether everything is carved into stone.

There have been rumours about migrating to koji+bodhi+mash as well as pkgdb. Status updates are non-existant, however. [...]

Hi! The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed: avbin-7-8_fc11 on  http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3187-avbin-7-8.fc11/ppc

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 08:01 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > motion-3_2_11-4_fc11 on > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3261... That's a bug which should be corrected in motion's next version, coming out in a couple of days. Until then, I think I can wait? I can also patch that in the current version if it's *really* needed.

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: [...] > kmediafactory-0_7_0-0_3_rc2_fc11 on > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3233... The correct logs are actually here:

This fails due to broken deps in mplayer (and it tries to build it anyway even though yum failed and chokes on the cmake_kde4 macro because kde-filesystem is not installed, looks like a bug in mock). We need mplayer fixed first.

/usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Offset (132296) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (91833). CMakeFiles/kmf.dir/kmftools.o: In function `KMF::Tools::loadStringFromFile(KUrl const&, QString*, bool)': /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmftools.cpp:667: undefined reference to `KIO::NetAccess::download(KUrl const&, QString&, QWidget*)' /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmftools.cpp:678: undefined reference to `KIO::NetAccess::removeTempFile(QString const&)' CMakeFiles/kmf.dir/kmftools.o: In function `KMF::Tools::saveString2File(KUrl const&, QString const&, bool)': /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmftools.cpp:646: undefined reference to `KIO::NetAccess::upload(QString const&, KUrl const&, QWidget*)' /usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Offset (65994) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (9311). CMakeFiles/kmf.dir/kmfmultiurldialog.o: In function `KMFMultiURLDialog::add()': /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmfmultiurldialog.cpp:84: undefined reference to `KFileDialog::getOpenFileNames(KUrl const&, QString const&, QWidget*, QString const&)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [lib/libkmf.so.0.7.0_rc2] Error 1

Hi! wormsofprey-0_4_3-4_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3315...

vice-2_1-2_fc11 on http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/3...

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info&gt; wrote: > The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed: > gambatte-0_4_1-2_fc11 on > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3217... I fixed this in CVS, but the builders seem broken for ppc and ppc64. http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3442...

The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:

On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: [...] > Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild: 502 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 snes9x 503 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 raine 505 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 sidplay 508 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 streamri 510 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 subtitle 514 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 streamdv 516 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 flvtool2 519 2009-04-07 2009-04-11 vdr-mp3 [...] > Just to point out the obvious: A few bugs are five days (19 days now) > old and the maintainer didn't even replied yet. I'd wondering if we in should drop the packages from the devel repo that remain unfixed in one or two weeks from now; of course we would need to announce that in the bug report a few days before we actually do it. And we'd need to check if the packages we drop are needed by other packages in the repo. Options?

>> Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild:

> 502     2009-04-07      2009-04-07      snes9x matthias...rpmforge.net > 503     2009-04-07      2009-04-07      raine lxtnow...gmail.com > 505     2009-04-07      2009-04-07      sidplay triad...df.lth.se > 508     2009-04-07      2009-04-07      streamri lxtnow...gmail.com > 510     2009-04-07      2009-04-07      subtitle lxtnow...gmail.com (subtitleripper? there is no package called subtitle) > 514     2009-04-07      2009-04-07      streamdvd lxtnow...gmail.com > 516     2009-04-07      2009-04-07      flvtool2 matthias...rpmforge.net > 519     2009-04-07      2009-04-11      vdr-mp3 felix...fetzig.org > [...] >> >> Just to point out the obvious: A few bugs are five days > > (19 days now) >> >> old and the maintainer didn't even replied yet.

> I'd wondering if we in should drop the packages from the devel repo that > remain unfixed in one or two weeks from now; of course we would need to > announce that in the bug report a few days before we actually do it. And > we'd need to check if the packages we drop are needed by other packages > in the repo. > > Options? Nobody? Should I take that as agreement or disagreement to "let's drop what doesn't build anymore" idea?

> I think we should open bugs in bugzilla Why open new bugs? The bugs are there already (see Bugs taht are blocking #501) and IMHO can be used for further discussions (and are the best place for them IMHO). That's why I didn't CC people and why I said "of course we would need to announce that in the bug reports a few days before we actually do it". ;-) Sorry, should have clearer from the start.

> for these and then follow the > standard "Non Responsive Maintainers" policy that Fedora has: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMain... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS would be the proper way here IMHO. I tend to say "NonResponsiveMaintainers" would have to much impact. Especially as we know that most (all) of them are in fact around and are still maintaining other packages.

On 26.04.2009 14:13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed: >> A lot of rebuild problems have been fixed, > And some more have have been fixed over the past few days :-) >> but there are still some to go. > Still the case. >> Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild: > [...] We are now down to 5 packages that have not been rebuild: 503 lxtnow(a)gmail.com raine (no response) 505 triad(a)df.lth.se sidplay (no response) 510 lxtnow(a)gmail.com subtitle (no response) 514 lxtnow(a)gmail.com streamdv (no response) 519 felix(a)fetzig.org vdr-mp3 (response: upstream contacted) We sooner or later need to decide what to do with those... Cu knurd