https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6404 Bug ID: 6404 Summary: Review request: atomes - An atomistic toolbox Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: sebastien.leroux(a)ipcms.unistra.fr CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 namespace: free First of all thanks in advance for the person who will consider this review ;-) URL of spec file: https://github.com/Slookeur/Atomes-rpm-build/blob/main/atomes.spec URL of source RPM: https://github.com/Slookeur/Atomes-rpm-build/blob/main/atomes-1.1.0-1.src... Description: Atomes: a toolbox to analyze, to visualize and to edit/create three-dimensional atomistic models. It offers a workspace that allows to have many projects opened simultaneously. The different projects in the workspace can exchange data: analysis results, atomic coordinates ... Atomes also provides an advanced input preparation system for further calculations using well known molecular dynamics codes: Classical MD : DLPOLY and LAMMPS ab-initio MD : CPMD and CP2K QM-MM MD : CPMD and CP2K To prepare the input filles for these calculations is likely to be the key, and most complicated step towards MD simulations. Atomes offers a user-friendly assistant to help and guide the user step by step to achieve this crucial step. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: The mock build failed because Atomes requires ffmpeg-dev(to build)/ffmpeg(to run) therefore I do not think that it can be included in Fedora rpmlint on the source package: 'rpmlint atomes-1.1.0-1.src.rpm' ======== rpmlint session starts ======== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 ======== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s ======== rpmlint on the binary package: 'atomes-1.1.0-1.x86_64.rpm' ======== rpmlint session starts ======== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 atomes.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary atomes atomes.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.0 ['1.1.0-1', '1.1.0-1'] ======== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s ======== Warnings: 1) no manual page indeed, is it mandatory ? 2) no idea how to handle the '-1' (or any other for that matter) number at the end and get a match with the version number Finally this is the program's website: https://atomes.ipcms.fr/ The sources are available at: https://github.com/Slookeur/Atomes It is my first RPM fusion package ! And yes I am seeking a sponsor ! Thank you very much for your consideration ;-) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.