4:24 p.m.
2012/7/2 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)rpmfusion.org>:
Author: hobbes1069
Update of /cvs/free/rpms/mpg123/EL-6
In directory old02.ovh.rpmfusion.lan:/tmp/cvs-serv22845
Modified Files:
.cvsignore mpg123.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jul 02 2012 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 1.14.3-1
- Update to latest upstream release.
Please can you avoid to hijack the development process doing unknown
update in the EL branch ?
You are not the only EL interested user/developer so no mess should be
expected in this area.
Nicolas (kwizart)
4:29 p.m.
New subject: rpms/mpg123/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 mpg123.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2012/7/2 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)rpmfusion.org>:
> Author: hobbes1069
>
> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/mpg123/EL-6
> In directory old02.ovh.rpmfusion.lan:/tmp/cvs-serv22845
>
> Modified Files:
> .cvsignore mpg123.spec sources
> Log Message:
> * Mon Jul 02 2012 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 1.14.3-1
> - Update to latest upstream release.
Please can you avoid to hijack the development process doing unknown
update in the EL branch ?
You are not the only EL interested user/developer so no mess should be
expected in this area.
Maybe we need to update this guidelines in there area... How do I know
who also maintainers this package? Also, are we not supposed to
general build the latest released version of a package? It looked like
Hans was the main Fedora maintainer and he has mentioned several times
in the past he has no interest in EL...
Richard
4:49 p.m.
New subject: rpms/mpg123/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 mpg123.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6
On Seg, 2012-07-02 at 11:29 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Nicolas Chauvet
<kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/7/2 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)rpmfusion.org>:
>> Author: hobbes1069
>>
>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/mpg123/EL-6
>> In directory old02.ovh.rpmfusion.lan:/tmp/cvs-serv22845
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> .cvsignore mpg123.spec sources
>> Log Message:
>> * Mon Jul 02 2012 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 1.14.3-1
>> - Update to latest upstream release.
>
> Please can you avoid to hijack the development process doing unknown
> update in the EL branch ?
> You are not the only EL interested user/developer so no mess should be
> expected in this area.
Maybe we need to update this guidelines in there area... How do I know
who also maintainers this package? Also, are we not supposed to
general build the latest released version of a package? It looked like
Hans was the main Fedora maintainer and he has mentioned several times
in the past he has no interest in EL...
I think the problem is not update devel branch
in devel still
65a41769832e14d6dfab1809fb4a17bb mpg123-1.13.7.tar.bz2
--
Sérgio M. B.
4:50 p.m.
New subject: rpms/mpg123/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 mpg123.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6
2012/7/2 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Nicolas Chauvet
<kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/7/2 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)rpmfusion.org>:
>> Author: hobbes1069
>>
>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/mpg123/EL-6
>> In directory old02.ovh.rpmfusion.lan:/tmp/cvs-serv22845
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> .cvsignore mpg123.spec sources
>> Log Message:
>> * Mon Jul 02 2012 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 1.14.3-1
>> - Update to latest upstream release.
>
> Please can you avoid to hijack the development process doing unknown
> update in the EL branch ?
> You are not the only EL interested user/developer so no mess should be
> expected in this area.
Maybe we need to update this guidelines in there area... How do I know
who also maintainers this package? Also, are we not supposed to
general build the latest released version of a package? It looked like
Hans was the main Fedora maintainer and he has mentioned several times
in the past he has no interest in EL...
Who do you believe you will abuse with this
twisted reasoning ?
You are a co-maintainer of the devel branch along with EL-6.
Please review the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy and
consider EL-6 as a "deep stable" branch
not a branch ahead of any fedora development branch.
Nicolas (kwizart)
5:04 p.m.
New subject: rpms/mpg123/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 mpg123.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 18:50:08 +0200
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> * Mon Jul 02 2012 Richard Shaw
<hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 1.14.3-1
>>> - Update to latest upstream release.
>>
>> Please can you avoid to hijack the development process doing
>> unknown update in the EL branch ?
>> You are not the only EL interested user/developer so no mess
>> should be expected in this area.
>
> Maybe we need to update this guidelines in there area... How do I
> know who also maintainers this package? Also, are we not supposed to
> general build the latest released version of a package? It looked
> like Hans was the main Fedora maintainer and he has mentioned
> several times in the past he has no interest in EL...
Who do you believe you will abuse with this twisted reasoning ?
You are a co-maintainer of the devel branch along with EL-6.
Please review the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy and
consider EL-6 as a "deep stable" branch
not a branch ahead of any fedora development branch.
But if there had not been any EL-6 build for this package yet, there is
nothing preventing the initial build to be the latest version
available, even if it's ahead of all Fedora branches, as those are
always meant to be completely independent from EL.
Matthias
--
Matthias Saou ██ ██
██ ██
Web: http://matthias.saou.eu/ ██████████████
Mail/XMPP: matthias(a)saou.eu ████ ██████ ████
██████████████████████
GPG: 4096R/E755CC63 ██ ██████████████ ██
8D91 7E2E F048 9C9C 46AF ██ ██ ██ ██
21A9 7A51 7B82 E755 CC63 ████ ████
5:34 p.m.
New subject: rpms/mpg123/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 mpg123.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2012/7/2 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>:
> Maybe we need to update this guidelines in there area... How do I know
> who also maintainers this package? Also, are we not supposed to
> general build the latest released version of a package? It looked like
> Hans was the main Fedora maintainer and he has mentioned several times
> in the past he has no interest in EL...
Who do you believe you will abuse with this twisted reasoning ?
You are a co-maintainer of the devel branch along with EL-6.
Please review the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy and
consider EL-6 as a "deep stable" branch
not a branch ahead of any fedora development branch.
Since I only request access to the EL-6 I was unaware that that also
grants me access to the devel branch. Shall I go ahead and update the
devel branch then?
Richard
5:38 p.m.
New subject: rpms/mpg123/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 mpg123.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6
Hi,
On 07/02/2012 07:34 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Nicolas Chauvet
<kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/7/2 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>:
>> Maybe we need to update this guidelines in there area... How do I know
>> who also maintainers this package? Also, are we not supposed to
>> general build the latest released version of a package? It looked like
>> Hans was the main Fedora maintainer and he has mentioned several times
>> in the past he has no interest in EL...
> Who do you believe you will abuse with this twisted reasoning ?
> You are a co-maintainer of the devel branch along with EL-6.
>
> Please review the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy and
> consider EL-6 as a "deep stable" branch
> not a branch ahead of any fedora development branch.
Since I only request access to the EL-6 I was unaware that that also
grants me access to the devel branch. Shall I go ahead and update the
devel branch then?
Yes please, and while at it can
you also fix: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1898
please?
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
12:52 a.m.
New subject: rpms/mpg123/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 mpg123.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Since I only request access to the EL-6 I was unaware that that also
grants me access to the devel branch. Shall I go ahead and update the
devel branch then?
I wish this was the case. I didn't get commit rights to xmltv's devel
branch; just EL-6. It is going to be tricky to keep the specs in sync.
- Ken
10:10 a.m.
New subject: rpms/mpg123/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 mpg123.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6
2012/7/3 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com>:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Richard Shaw
<hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Since I only request access to the EL-6 I was unaware that that also
> grants me access to the devel branch. Shall I go ahead and update the
> devel branch then?
I wish this was the case. I didn't get commit rights to xmltv's devel
branch; just EL-6. It is going to be tricky to keep the specs in sync.
That's a different problem, you don't have even acl on EL-6 branch.
Nicolas (kwizart)
8:11 p.m.
New subject: rpms/mpg123/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 mpg123.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2012/7/3 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com>:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Since I only request access to the EL-6 I was unaware that that also
>> grants me access to the devel branch. Shall I go ahead and update the
>> devel branch then?
>
> I wish this was the case. I didn't get commit rights to xmltv's devel
> branch; just EL-6. It is going to be tricky to keep the specs in sync.
That's a different problem, you don't have even acl on EL-6 branch.
Good point! I missed that you hadn't removed RF_CVSsync from
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/34 yet.
- Ken
4559
days inactive
4560
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
9 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Hans de Goede -
Ken Dreyer -
Matthias Saou -
Nicolas Chauvet -
Richard Shaw -
Sérgio Basto