8:42 a.m.
On 08.11.2008 00:13, Xavier Lamien wrote:
Author: laxathom
Update of /cvs/nonfree/CVSROOT
In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/tmps27459/modules
Modified Files:
modules
Log Message:
Added new branch F-10 for module: xv
Hmmm. Do we really want to branching packages for F-10?
* We don't have support on F-11 on the builders yet
* We don't have full support for a F-10 target yet
* We have no place where the push scripts could push F-11 packages to
IOW: With our current setup I'd say it makes less work for everyone (and
especially for those [e.g. me] what would have to adjust the setup on
the builders) if we wait with branching CVS for F-10 until a few days
before F-10 really ships.
CU
knurd
10:21 a.m.
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info> wrote:
On 08.11.2008 00:13, Xavier Lamien wrote:
>
> Author: laxathom
>
> Update of /cvs/nonfree/CVSROOT
> In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/tmps27459/modules
>
> Modified Files:
> modules Log Message:
> Added new branch F-10 for module: xv
Hmmm. Do we really want to branching packages for F-10?
Yeah, this can be easily done and stay transparent for contributors.
* We don't have support on F-11 on the builders yet
* We don't have full support for a F-10 target yet
As you said, not yet. Targets are already set-up and awaiting F-10
official availability (including f10 repo)
* We have no place where the push scripts could push F-11 packages to
The place will be available once f10 will come out.
IOW: With our current setup I'd say it makes less work for
everyone (and
especially for those [e.g. me] what would have to adjust the setup on the
builders) if we wait with branching CVS for F-10 until a few days before
F-10 really ships.
Actually this branch is due to my work on an mass-branching helper i'm writing .
We have 18 days left.
--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
10:42 a.m.
New subject: Branching for F-10
On 08.11.2008 11:21, Xavier Lamien wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
<fedora(a)leemhuis.info> wrote:
> On 08.11.2008 00:13, Xavier Lamien wrote:
>> Author: laxathom
>>
>> Update of /cvs/nonfree/CVSROOT
>> In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/tmps27459/modules
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> modules Log Message:
>> Added new branch F-10 for module: xv
> Hmmm. Do we really want to branching packages for F-10?
Yeah, this can be easily done and stay transparent for contributors.
But where is the benefit? And how do you prevent that somebody over the
next 18 days buikds something in the F-10 branch and forgets to update
the devel branch?
I'd say the ideal point for us to branch packages is when the builders
and the push scripts are actually updated and configured to build
against a different set of packages (e.g. when we have a F-10 repos and
before rawhide moves on). Before that there is no benefit.
[...]
> * We have no place where the push scripts could push F-11 packages to
The place will be available once f10 will come out.
Sure it will, but afaics branching now just creates confusion. But
whatever, I don't care much, if you really think it makes sense go ahead.
CU
knurd
5888
days inactive
5888
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Thorsten Leemhuis -
Xavier Lamien