Fedora 17 EOL
by Emmanuel Seyman
Hello, all.
AS you've probably heard, Fedora 17 went EOL today. No new updates will be
released for it and users are encouraged to migrate to F18+.
Accordingly, I've added a comment to all F17 bugs in RPMFusion's bugzilla
that they will be closed with the EXPIRED resolution next week unless
someone moves them to a supported version of Fedora.
Emmanuel
11 years, 4 months
problem with today's nvidia update?
by Neal Becker
Seems to be trying to drag in nvidia-173x, even though I don't have that
installed
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:3.9.9-302.fc19 will be installed
---> Package nvidia-settings.x86_64 0:1.0-32.fc19 will be obsoleted
---> Package nvidia-settings-desktop.x86_64 0:1.0-32.fc19 will be obsoleted
---> Package nvidia-xconfig.x86_64 0:1.0-28.fc19 will be obsoleted
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia.x86_64 1:319.32-4.fc19 will be obsoleting
--> Processing Dependency: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs(x86-64) =
1:319.32-4.fc19 for package: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-4.fc19.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: nvidia-kmod >= 1:319.32 for package:
1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-4.fc19.x86_64
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx.x86_64 0:173.14.37-2.fc19 will be
obsoleting
--> Processing Dependency: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-libs(x86-64) =
173.14.37-2.fc19 for package:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.37-2.fc19.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: nvidia-173xx-kmod >= 173.14.37 for package:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.37-2.fc19.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: nvidia-173xx-kmod >= 173.14.37 for package:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.37-2.fc19.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libGLcore.so.1()(64bit) for package:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.37-2.fc19.x86_64
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx.x86_64 0:304.88-5.fc19 will be
updated
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx.x86_64 0:304.88-9.fc19 will be
obsoleting
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-libs.x86_64 0:304.88-5.fc19 will be
updated
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-libs.x86_64 0:304.88-9.fc19 will be
an update
--> Running transaction check
---> Package akmod-nvidia.x86_64 1:319.32-1.fc19 will be installed
---> Package akmod-nvidia-173xx.x86_64 0:173.14.37-1.fc19.4 will be
installed
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-libs.x86_64 0:173.14.37-2.fc19 will
be installed
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs.x86_64 1:319.32-4.fc19 will be
installed
--> Processing Conflict: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-4.fc19.x86_64
conflicts xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx
--> Processing Conflict: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.37-2.fc19.x86_64
conflicts xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
--> Processing Conflict: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.37-2.fc19.x86_64
conflicts xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
--> Processing Conflict: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-304.88-9.fc19.x86_64
conflicts xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx conflicts with
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-304.88-9.fc19.x86_64
Error: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx conflicts with
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.37-2.fc19.x86_64
Error: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx conflicts with
1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-4.fc19.x86_64
Error: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia conflicts with
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.37-2.fc19.x86_64
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
** Found 2 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows:
miro-5.0.4-2.fc18.x86_64 has missing requires of libavutil.so.51()(64bit)
miro-5.0.4-2.fc18.x86_64 has missing requires of
libavutil.so.51(LIBAVUTIL_51)(64bit)
nbecker@nbecker1 ~$ rpm -qa *nvidia*
kmod-nvidia-304xx-3.9.8-300.fc19.x86_64-304.88-1.fc19.5.x86_64
nvidia-settings-desktop-1.0-32.fc19.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-304.88-5.fc19.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-304xx-3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64-304.88-1.fc19.6.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-libs-304.88-5.fc19.x86_64
akmod-nvidia-304xx-304.88-1.fc19.3.x86_64
nvidia-xconfig-1.0-28.fc19.x86_64
nvidia-settings-1.0-32.fc19.x86_64
11 years, 5 months
libopencl.so in akmod-nvidia?
by Michael Clerx
Dear all,
I'm using the "akmod-nvidia" package to get CUDA / OpenCL drivers for my
Nvidia GPU. However, I'm unable to find the opencl shared object files.
Are they packaged with akmod-nvidia or do I need to install them from
some other source?
Thanks,
Michael
11 years, 5 months
GLX problem with nvidia 304.88
by John Pilkington
Hi: I've been using 304.88 under 3.8.13-100.fc17.x86_64 without
problems. Today I installed 3.9.8-100 and its kmod, and the glx module
from Xorg is being loaded. Attempts to run Mythfrontend or Mythtvsetup
go straight back to the login screen.
My xorg.conf has
Section "Files"
# ModulePath "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia"
ModulePath "/usr/lib64/nvidia/xorg"
# ModulePath "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions"
ModulePath "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/default/Type1"
EndSection
(where the lines commented out were originally installed by 304.64,
which then had the same problem)
and /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/00-nvidia.conf has
Section "Files"
ModulePath "/usr/lib64/nvidia-304xx/xorg"
ModulePath "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules"
EndSection
Both of these look as if the nvidia modules should get preference.
Reverting to the earlier kernel doesn't revert to a good working system;
I have the same problem there now.
Suggestions?
Thanks,
John P
11 years, 5 months
kmod-openafs for kernel 3.9.6
by Suvayu Ali
Hi,
I was wondering if there are any problems with kmod-openafs for the
latest stable kernel available in the official Fedora repositories. I
think I have been holding out on the kernel update for about a week
waiting for the kmod package to show up. Any update on the status
would be great.
Thanks and cheers,
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
11 years, 5 months
