January 2014 - rpmfusion-users

Fedora new install, what is the repo url please?

by Dave Pawson

Planning on installing Fedora 20 64 bit on a new laptop with an nVidia GT730M card. I know I'm prompted to 'add repos' for the install, but from yum.repos.d in the file I see http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/development/$basearch/os/ How should I translate this to add it as a workable url please, and are there more I should add? TiA -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk

11 years

3
4
0 / 0

Switching nVidia drivers?

by Ed Greshko

Running Fedora 20 and currently have akmod-nvidia-304xx xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx kmod-nvidia-304xx bits installed. I'm considering changing my video card to a newer one with dual DVI outputs and thinking I'll want to switch to akmod-nvidia, xorg-x11-drv-nvidia, etc to get the 331.38 branch of drivers. Any recommendations or gotchas on the procedure to achieve the switch? Thanks, Ed

11 years

2
2
0 / 0

bug :: vlc :: directory add to playlist

by Adrian Sevcenco

Hi! It seems that vlc have a problem with adding directories to playlist. This problem was solved with https://github.com/videolan/vlc/commit/d34e44dea5ffc8212630ef7bb3f5fabf7f... Is it possible to cherry-pick this commit and rebuild vlc? Thank you! Adrian

11 years

2
1
0 / 0

Livna repository missing -debug and -source mirror list

by Mathias Nicolajsen Kjærgaard

The /etc/yum.repos.d/livna.repo file provided in livna-release-1-1.noarch has broken links to debuginfo(http://rpm.livna.org/mirrorlist-debug) and sources(http://rpm.livna.org/mirrorlist-source). Please consider providing these two mirror list, as the broken links seems to confuse the Automatic Bug Reporting Tool, when it is searching for debuginfo for packages unrelated to Livna. Best regards Mathias

11 years

5
9
0 / 0

gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree

by Azat Khasanshin

Hello, I was wondering why there is gstreamer-plugins-bad-nonfree in the repository but no gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree. Is it a mistake, or the package is not included for some other reason? Thanks -- Regards, Azat Khasanshin

11 years

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora 18 EOL

by Emmanuel Seyman

Hello, all. Fedora 18 was EOL-ed today and RPMFusion will no longer be releasing updates for it. I've added a comment in all F18 bugs that I will be closing them next week as RESOLVED:EXPIRED. If you believe that a bug is still valid for newer versions of Fedora, please update the "version" field. Emmanuel

11 years

1
0
0 / 0

[RPMFusion Nvidia] pre-release driver repository?

by Alex G.S.

I'm just getting started with Fedora after migrating from Ubuntu. I'm also a huge Nvidia junky and I currently use your Nvidia driver in Fedora. Recently Nvidia released it's 331.38 driver: http://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/72249/en-us Have some questions for you: When is the 331.38 driver expected to hit RPMFusion? Do you have a pre-release driver repository for testing? Btw. thanks for the Nvidia packages and taking the time to read this!

11 years

1
0
0 / 0

librtmp soname bump?!

by Reindl Harald

should i rebuild my packages against librtmp-2.4-1.20131205.gitdc76f0a.fc20.x86_64 or will this soname-breakage reverted? [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ yum upgrade Loaded plugins: etckeeper, protectbase, tsflags rhsoft-fedora | 2.9 kB 00:00:00 rhsoft-generic | 2.9 kB 00:00:00 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package librtmp.x86_64 0:2.4-0.3.20110811gitc58cfb3e.fc19 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: librtmp.so.0()(64bit) for package: ffmpeg-libs-2.1.1-5.fc20.20131231.rh.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: librtmp.so.0()(64bit) for package: ffmpeg-compat-0.6.7-3.fc20.x86_64 ---> Package librtmp.x86_64 0:2.4-1.20131205.gitdc76f0a.fc20 will be an update ---> Package qtwebkit.x86_64 0:2.3.3-2.fc20 will be updated ---> Package qtwebkit.x86_64 0:2.3.3-3.fc20 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution --> Finding unneeded leftover dependencies Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies Error: Package: ffmpeg-libs-2.1.1-5.fc20.20131231.rh.x86_64 (installed) Requires: librtmp.so.0()(64bit) Removing: librtmp-2.4-0.3.20110811gitc58cfb3e.fc19.x86_64 (installed) librtmp.so.0()(64bit) Updated By: librtmp-2.4-1.20131205.gitdc76f0a.fc20.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-updates-testing) ~librtmp.so.1()(64bit) Error: Package: ffmpeg-compat-0.6.7-3.fc20.x86_64 (installed) Requires: librtmp.so.0()(64bit) Removing: librtmp-2.4-0.3.20110811gitc58cfb3e.fc19.x86_64 (installed) librtmp.so.0()(64bit) Updated By: librtmp-2.4-1.20131205.gitdc76f0a.fc20.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-updates-testing) ~librtmp.so.1()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

11 years

2
2
0 / 0

fedup f18 to f19 question

by John Pilkington

I have f18 fully updated. On running 'fedup --network 19' I see: Packages without updates: <snip> kernel-3.11.10-100.fc18.x86_64 <snip> and broken dependencies: kmod-nvidia-304xx-3.11.10-100.fc18.x86_64-304.116-1.fc18.x86_64 requires kernel-3.11.10-100.fc18.x86_64 f19 updates has 3.12.6-200 and there is a matching kmod here: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/19/x86_64/kmod-nvid... So why the complaints, and should I really expect problems? TIA John P

11 years

1
1
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

rpmfusion-users January 2014