2014/1/6 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
should i rebuild my packages against librtmp-2.4-1.20131205.gitdc76f0a.fc20.x86_64
or will this soname-breakage reverted?

[root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ yum upgrade
Loaded plugins: etckeeper, protectbase, tsflags
rhsoft-fedora                                                                                           | 2.9 kB
rhsoft-generic                                                                                          | 2.9 kB
0 packages excluded due to repository protections
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package librtmp.x86_64 0:2.4-0.3.20110811gitc58cfb3e.fc19 will be updated
--> Processing Dependency: librtmp.so.0()(64bit) for package: ffmpeg-libs-2.1.1-5.fc20.20131231.rh.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: librtmp.so.0()(64bit) for package: ffmpeg-compat-0.6.7-3.fc20.x86_64
---> Package librtmp.x86_64 0:2.4-1.20131205.gitdc76f0a.fc20 will be an update
---> Package qtwebkit.x86_64 0:2.3.3-2.fc20 will be updated
---> Package qtwebkit.x86_64 0:2.3.3-3.fc20 will be an update
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
--> Finding unneeded leftover dependencies
Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies
Error: Package: ffmpeg-libs-2.1.1-5.fc20.20131231.rh.x86_64 (installed)

This is not our ffmpeg package, the librtpm was disabled there on purpose.

That been said, others packages are affected by the librtpm bump and there is indeed a rebuilt been done.
I will push the packages ASAP. This is coordinated by the maintainer.

Nicolas (kwizart)