On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@greysector.net> wrote:
Hi Richard,

On Tuesday, 06 August 2013 at 03:41, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I don't think there's any reason mediainfo[1] can't go in Fedora, but I
> figured the most likely user base would be here in RPM Fusion.
> This has been a useful utility for me giving very detailed media
> information and I'm considering submitting it for review anyway, but it
> requires two other libraries that are not yet in Fedora and I've got enough
> packages to take care of as it is.
> That being said, if someone will help with the reviews and offer to
> co-maintain, I'd consider submitting them for review.

I can review, but not co-maintain. (Un)fortunately, upstream provides
their own RPMs, which are... odd. You'll need to come up with a set of
Provides: and Obsoletes: and try to convince upstream to stop doing
their own and point to official Fedora repositories instead once it
passes review.

I was trying to decide if I would bother trying make the official packages conflict with theirs, I think it may be more of a case of caveat emptor. In the case of the libraries though, he appends a 0 to the package name. I'm not sure what problems that would create.