Re: what about soname bumps and rebuilds

Am 02.11.2015 um 19:14 schrieb Reindl Harald: > Am 02.11.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Sérgio Basto: >> On Seg, 2015-11-02 at 15:35 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Fedora 23 >>> >>> * x264 so 148 >>> * avidemux requires so 142 >>> * the gstreamer ugly requires so 142 >>> >>> why does that happen *everytime* when somebody decides to bump x264 >>> without take care of rebuild depending packages? >>> >> >> Where you got x264 so 148 ? > > rpmfusion testing most likely? > >> it happens , hold your breath please > > for how long? > > 6 days and the few deps are not rebuilt > normally that should happen instantly if not automated at all > > [root@rh:~]$ ls /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1019K 2015-10-27 18:29 /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148 congratulations, avidemux dependencies are now broken in stable updates too even for Fedora 21 F21: Error: Package: avidemux-qt-2.6.10-1.fc21.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libADM_render6_QT5.so()(64bit) F23: nothing provides libADM_render6_QT5.so()(64bit) needed by avidemux-qt-2.6.10-1.fc23.x86_64 nothing provides libx264.so.142 needed by avidemux-qt-2.6.8-3.fc22.i686 thanks god it can't solve i686 deps on a pure x86_64 machine where dnf/yum tries to fallback because the unsolveable deps....