On 05/02/16 11:03, David A. De Graaf wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:55:11PM -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
> On 31/01/16 16:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> I wrote the inquiry below to the fedora users maillinglist
>>> but there was no response except a suggestion to ask here,
>>> so this is it.
>>
>> I recently had a problem with the nvidia-340xx. I would only get a blank screen
with no X
>> being started. I did not check the logs I just did what has worked for me in the
past.
>>
>> 1. dnf erase *nvidia*
>> 2. reboot (You could either boot to gui using nouveau or multi-user mode)
>> 3. dnf install akmod-nvidia-340xx (In your case akmod-nvidia-304xx
>> 4. reboot
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Since writing the text below, another Fedora 23
>>> kernel-4.3.3-303.fc23.x86_64 made an appearance, along with a new
>>> kmod-nvidia-304xx-4.3.3-303.fc23.x86_64-304.131-1.fc23.x86_64
>>> but they exhibit the identical fault.
>>>
>>> ******
>>> The latest two kernels and the nvidia-304xx module are incompatible.
>>> That is, the nvidia.ko module built by akmod-nvidia-304xx won't load.
>>> That means that my three machines with older nvidia video cards (one
>>> built into the mobo) are stuck running the old
>>>
>>>> kernel-4.2.8-300.fc23.x86_64
>>> kernel-4.3.3-300.fc23.x86_64
>>> kernel-4.3.3-301.fc23.x86_64
>>>
>>> In the past, incompatibilities were resolved in about a week.
>>> This time, it's nearly a month. No new package of akmod-nvidia-304xx
>>> or kmod-nvidia-304xx has shown up at the
>>> rpmfusion-nonfree-updates[-testing] repo.
>>>
>>> The akmod-nvidia-340xx module on another machine that needs it runs fine.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have a clue when this older version of the nvidia module
>>> might be fixed?
>>>
>>> Here are the error messages with the newer kernel:
>>>
>>> Console error message when trying to run 'startxfce':
>>>
>>> (==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
>>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nvidia': Unknown symbol in
module,
>>> or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
>>>
>>>
>>> From dmesg:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> [ 12.563315] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
>>> [ 12.563325] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
>>> [ 12.573867] nvidia: Unknown symbol mtrr_del (err 0)
>>> [ 12.573977] nvidia: Unknown symbol mtrr_add (err 0)
>>> ...
>>> [ 31.162308] nvidia: Unknown symbol mtrr_del (err 0)
>>> [ 31.162397] nvidia: Unknown symbol mtrr_add (err 0)
>>> ...
>>> [ 81.656643] nvidia: Unknown symbol mtrr_del (err 0)
>>> [ 81.656736] nvidia: Unknown symbol mtrr_add (err 0)
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> I tried akmods for 340 on F23 and it doesn't work either. It won't
> compile.
>
> Testing from a terminal using akmods --force to rebuild them, I found that
> there is an error in the kernel source that won't work.
>
> I will start a different thread about it.
>
> Robin
Robin:
I'm glad to see (from your other thread) that you were able to fix
your nvidia-340xx setup. As I said above, my experience with that
version has been completely satisfactory. It is only the nvidia-304xx
module that is, and remains, broken. Perhaps your experience
demonstrates why fresh installs should be preferred over upgrades.
Today my brother's machine in Italy that I maintain via an ipsec tunnel
also failed with the nvidia-304xx package and a dnf update. To my
surprise I found his video card is a GeForce 605, which purports to be
new enough to be supported by the mainstream nvidia driver. Sure enough,
when I installed the akmod-nvidia-358.16-1.fc22.x86_64, it worked.
So my experiments confirm that
akmod-nvidia-358.16-1.fc22.x86_64 - works
akmod-nvidia-340xx-340.96-1.fc23.x86_64 - works
akmod-nvidia-304xx-304.131-1.fc23.x86_64 - fails
It is funny how the obvious seems to be missed when a problem occurs
because we feel that it cannot be the obvious.
I still get stuck on that one, even after all these years. I need to
slap myself for missing it.
Robin