On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:39:16AM -0500, George Galt wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Patrick <patman@aracnet.com> wrote:
>

> > Did you have any problems with libnvcuvid.so?
>
>

> ATrpms had this same issue last month.  The issue is that rpm inspects the
> binaries and builds a list of things required and things that the package
> provides.  For some reason, it generates a dependency of
> libnvcuvid.so()(64-bit) but builds a list of the things provided of
> libnvcuvid.so.1(64-bit) (IIRC).
>
> Look at the ATrpms dev list for how to fix this in the .spec file:
> http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/2012-December/thread.html
>
> In particular, I believe the suggestion here:
> http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/2012-December/002931.htmlwas
> the ultimate fix.  You could also look at the spec file in ATrpms for
> ideas:
> http://dl.atrpms.net/src/f17-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-154.src.rpm\
>
> FYI, I had no problem building this for F18 without applying the above fix,
> so I'm not sure if there is something that is different with Fedora <= 17
> that is causing this problem.

I tried adding "Autoreq: 0" to the spec file, and it made no difference.

I also tried adding another filter (though the existing one looks like it
should work correctly too) to the spec file, like this:

        %filter_from_requires /^libnvcuvid\.so/d;

That also made no difference.

I finally just installed using rpm with --nodeps, and it's booted and
working fine so far.

Hopefully my xorg execessive cpu usage problem will be solved, I won't
know until the system has been up for a while.

-- Patrick